agentboards.org
Compare/codehamr vs Neo

codehamrvsNeo

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

codehamr
codehamr · Terminal agent
#115OSS
Panel
6.7
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
9.3
Longevity
5.2

“Four tools and three slash commands, which is fewer features than most agents put in the onboarding screen.”

Neo
owainlewis · Terminal agent
#38OSS
Panel
6.7
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
8.2
Longevity
5.8

“You can queue your next instruction while it works, so now you can interrupt yourself without waiting for it to finish.”

Spec by spec

SpeccodehamrNeo
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoThe agent can bootstrap a headless browser as a verification helper when the machine allows it, but it has no browser tool of its own. No
Sandboxed executionNoYesNeo describes sandbox-first execution where the runtime contains tools; the README does not specify a container technology.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneOllama, vLLM, LM Studio, OpenAI-compatible endpointsAnthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, OpenRouter
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars219145

Which one would each critic pick

CriticcodehamrNeoPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.87.3Neo — Pick this if you lose the thread inside chat transcripts; pick a conversational agent if you would rather talk to it than read a dashboard of what it is doing.
El Crítico6.36.8Neo — Execution is called sandbox-first and the documentation names no containment technology, while confirmation is optional and applies only to selected interactive calls.
El Profesor7.87.5codehamr — It runs the tests, compiles, or loads the page, and prints `unverified:` when it cannot, which is the rarest honesty in this category.
La Inversora6.06.0no preference
La Jefa5.85.8no preference
El Hacker7.57.0codehamr — MIT, a `local` profile for Ollama, vLLM and LM Studio, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so the whole loop runs on hardware I built.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.