agentboards.org
Compare/Codex CLI vs Continue CLI

Codex CLIvsContinue CLI

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codex CLI
OpenAI · Terminal agent
#1OSSMCP
Panel
7.1
3 spec wins
Reliability
7.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.8
Longevity
7.2

“Apache-2.0, so you can read every line except the one that lets you pick a model that is not OpenAI's.”

Continue CLI
Continue · Terminal agent
#24OSSMCP
Panel
6.4
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
8.0
Longevity
5.2

“It installs by piping a URL straight into your shell, then politely asks permission before it touches a single file.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodex CLIContinue CLI
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoThe shared Codex codebase carries a browser-use configuration with Chrome DevTools Protocol access, but OpenAI's documentation states browser is not available in the Codex CLI or the IDE extension; it runs in ChatGPT on the web and in the desktop app. The CLI's --search flag adds live web search only. No
Sandboxed executionYesNoThe docs describe running the CLI inside a Docker container, not sandboxing the agent in one.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.x, GPT-5.x-Codexany provider configured in config.yaml, Anthropic
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYesThe CLI reads the same ~/.continue/config.yaml provider schema as the IDE extensions, including a custom apiBase, so any local server can be configured; the CLI pages defer to that reference rather than naming Ollama or LM Studio.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$8/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars127,56336,084

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodex CLIContinue CLIPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo8.06.8Codex CLI — If you already pay for ChatGPT, this is the terminal agent you have and it is a good one; open source, MCP, headless, and pointed at OpenAI until you configure it otherwise.
El Crítico7.06.3Codex CLI — A sandbox mode you choose once is the only barrier between the agent and your shell, the free tier is a taste, and the defaults point at one vendor.
El Profesor6.36.5Continue CLI — One configuration schema serves both the terminal agent and the editor extensions, which is the correct reuse; the command-line documentation defers to it rather than restating it.
La Inversora8.35.3Codex CLI — A lab's terminal agent bundled into a $20 subscription with 121,000 stars on the repo; the distribution is ChatGPT, and that is the whole thesis.
La Jefa7.36.0Codex CLI — Business at $20 a seat with SAML SSO and no default training, Enterprise for SCIM and audit logs; if the org is on ChatGPT already, this is a line item, not a project.
El Hacker5.87.8Continue CLI — Apache-2.0 with the whole thing in a public monorepo, and a provider block that takes a custom apiBase, which is how my own server gets in.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.