Skip to content
agentboards
Compare/Codex CLI vs mini-SWE-agent

Codex CLIvsmini-SWE-agent

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codex CLI
OpenAI · Terminal agent
#1OSSMCP
Panel
7.1
3 spec wins
Reliability
7.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.8
Longevity
7.2

“Apache-2.0, so you can read every line except the one that lets you pick a model that is not OpenAI's.”

mini-SWE-agent
SWE-agent (Princeton and Stanford) · Terminal agent
#8OSS
Panel
6.9
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
5.5
Cost
8.8
Longevity
7.0

“One hundred lines of Python, which is fewer than most competitors spend on their pricing page.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodex CLImini-SWE-agent
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoThe shared Codex codebase carries a browser-use configuration with Chrome DevTools Protocol access, but OpenAI's documentation states browser is not available in the Codex CLI or the IDE extension; it runs in ChatGPT on the web and in the desktop app. The CLI's --search flag adds live web search only. No
Sandboxed executionYesYes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.x, GPT-5.x-Codexany via litellm
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$8/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars128,7118,410

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodex CLImini-SWE-agentPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo8.06.8Codex CLI — If you already pay for ChatGPT, this is the terminal agent you have and it is a good one; open source, MCP, headless, and pointed at OpenAI until you configure it otherwise.
El Crítico7.06.5Codex CLI — A sandbox mode you choose once is the only barrier between the agent and your shell, the free tier is a taste, and the defaults point at one vendor.
El Profesor6.38.0mini-SWE-agent — The reference harness for the SWE-bench bash-only leaderboard: one bash action per turn via subprocess.run, a linear history, no tool-calling API, and Gemini 3 Pro reported above 74% on Verified.
La Inversora8.36.8Codex CLI — A lab's terminal agent bundled into a $20 subscription with 121,000 stars on the repo; the distribution is ChatGPT, and that is the whole thesis.
La Jefa7.35.0Codex CLI — Business at $20 a seat with SAML SSO and no default training, Enterprise for SCIM and audit logs; if the org is on ChatGPT already, this is a line item, not a project.
El Hacker5.88.5mini-SWE-agent — MIT, any model through litellm, OpenRouter or Portkey including my local server, a YAML config, and source short enough to read before breakfast; the missing MCP client is the only gap.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.
↑↓ navigate · Enter open · Esc close589 agents + guides