agentboards.org
Compare/Codex CLI vs Qwen Code

Codex CLIvsQwen Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codex CLI
OpenAI · Terminal agent
#1OSSMCP
Panel
7.1
2 spec wins
Reliability
7.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.8
Longevity
7.2

“Apache-2.0, so you can read every line except the one that lets you pick a model that is not OpenAI's.”

Qwen Code
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) · Terminal agent
#19OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.3
Longevity
6.3

“Ships a Java SDK, which tells you precisely which enterprises Alibaba expects to pay for it.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodex CLIQwen Code
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoThe shared Codex codebase carries a browser-use configuration with Chrome DevTools Protocol access, but OpenAI's documentation states browser is not available in the Codex CLI or the IDE extension; it runs in ChatGPT on the web and in the desktop app. The CLI's --search flag adds live web search only. YesThe first-party @qwen-code/chrome-bridge extension tunnels cdp_* frames from the `qwen serve` daemon into chrome.debugger so the agent drives a real Chrome tab, but console/network/screenshot/click tools need an external CDP MCP adapter set via QWEN_CDP_MCP_COMMAND, since none is bundled.
Sandboxed executionYesYesTwo real isolation modes - macOS Seatbelt via sandbox-exec (default `permissive-open` profile) and container-based Docker/Podman with a published sandbox image (https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/features/sandbox/).
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.x, GPT-5.x-CodexQwen3-Coder, OpenAI-compatible, Claude, Gemini
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$8/mon/a
Free tierYesNo
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars127,56328,271

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodex CLIQwen CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo8.07.0Codex CLI — If you already pay for ChatGPT, this is the terminal agent you have and it is a good one; open source, MCP, headless, and pointed at OpenAI until you configure it otherwise.
El Crítico7.06.3Codex CLI — A sandbox mode you choose once is the only barrier between the agent and your shell, the free tier is a taste, and the defaults point at one vendor.
El Profesor6.36.0Codex CLI — An open-source scaffold for one vendor's models, with a documented instruction file and a headless mode; the scaffold is inspectable, the capability is unmeasured.
La Inversora8.36.8Codex CLI — A lab's terminal agent bundled into a $20 subscription with 121,000 stars on the repo; the distribution is ChatGPT, and that is the whole thesis.
La Jefa7.35.8Codex CLI — Business at $20 a seat with SAML SSO and no default training, Enterprise for SCIM and audit logs; if the org is on ChatGPT already, this is a line item, not a project.
El Hacker5.88.8Qwen Code — Apache-2.0, OPENAI_BASE_URL pointed at my own box, modelProviders in settings.json, and MCP servers with a command or an httpUrl; the whole thing is mine to fork.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.