agentboards.org
Compare/Codex cloud vs II-Agent

Codex cloudvsII-Agent

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codex cloud
OpenAI · Autonomous SWE
#55
Panel
6.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.8
Longevity
7.0

“Ships models named Sol, Terra and Luna, so your pull request is now reviewed by a planetarium.”

II-Agent
Intelligent Internet · Autonomous SWE
#165OSS
Panel
6.4
7 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.5

“It generates illustrated storybooks and video, so your agent budget and your child's bedtime now share a provider.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodex cloudII-Agent
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runscloud, sandboxlocal, cloud
Platformswebmacos, linux, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoThe Browser capability and cloud browser belong to ChatGPT/ChatGPT Work, not to Codex cloud chats, whose containers only get configurable HTTP internet access (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/cloud/internet-access). Yes
Sandboxed executionYesEach chat gets its own container from the `universal` image, cached for up to 12 hours (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/environments/cloud-environment). Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneGPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 LunaAnthropic, OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, Azure OpenAI, self-hosted models
Bring your own modelNoThe Amazon Bedrock model-provider path is explicitly limited to local Codex surfaces and states that Codex cloud is not available (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/amazon-bedrock). Yes
Local modelsNoCloud chats run on OpenAI-hosted models only; the `model_provider` config that redirects inference is read by local clients, not by cloud containers. YesThe model config example documents Vertex AI, Azure and self-hosted model endpoints.
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoCloud tasks require a ChatGPT plan; an OpenAI API key does not unlock them. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryApache-2.0
GitHub starsn/a3,392

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodex cloudII-AgentPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.36.5Codex cloud — Pick Codex cloud if you already pay for ChatGPT and want to hand a task off from a GitHub pull request or a Slack thread and come back later; pick Jules if you live in the Google world.
El Crítico6.55.8Codex cloud — Each environment can be granted internet access and holds your secrets, so the agent is a container with your credentials and a network policy you configured once and forgot.
El Profesor6.86.5Codex cloud — Clone, setup scripts, parallel execution, then a summary and diff with logs to inspect; a research preview since May 16, 2025 on codex-1, with no benchmark published for the current models.
La Inversora8.06.3Codex cloud — OpenAI folded the Codex app into the ChatGPT desktop app in July 2026 and sells Pro from $100 with 5x or 20x limits; the coding agent is a retention feature for the subscription.
La Jefa7.05.5Codex cloud — Business is $20 per user, $1,200 a month for sixty, extra usage is credits priced per model, and there is an Enterprise tier, the shape procurement already knows from ChatGPT.
El Hacker3.57.8II-Agent — Apache-2.0, my keys, and the model config takes Vertex, Azure or a self-hosted endpoint, so inference can stay on hardware I picked.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.