agentboards.org
Compare/Codex cloud vs Ona

Codex cloudvsOna

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codex cloud
OpenAI · Autonomous SWE
#55
Panel
6.5
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.8
Longevity
7.0

“Ships models named Sol, Terra and Luna, so your pull request is now reviewed by a planetarium.”

Ona
Ona (OpenAI) · Autonomous SWE
#31MCP
Panel
6.6
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
5.0
Longevity
7.3

“Automations fan a fleet of agents across your codebase on a schedule, so now the on-call rotation includes the robots.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodex cloudOna
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runscloud, sandboxcloud, sandbox
Platformswebweb, macos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoThe Browser capability and cloud browser belong to ChatGPT/ChatGPT Work, not to Codex cloud chats, whose containers only get configurable HTTP internet access (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/cloud/internet-access). No
Sandboxed executionYesEach chat gets its own container from the `universal` image, cached for up to 12 hours (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/environments/cloud-environment). Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesAutomations run fleets of agents triggered by pull requests, schedules or webhooks.
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneGPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI Codex
Bring your own modelNoThe Amazon Bedrock model-provider path is explicitly limited to local Codex surfaces and states that Codex cloud is not available (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/amazon-bedrock). No
Local modelsNoCloud chats run on OpenAI-hosted models only; the `model_provider` config that redirects inference is read by local clients, not by cloud containers. No
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionmixed
Starts at$20/mo$20/mo
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyNoCloud tasks require a ChatGPT plan; an OpenAI API key does not unlock them. YesA Codex subscription can be connected to a Core plan.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodex cloudOnaPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.36.8Codex cloud — Pick Codex cloud if you already pay for ChatGPT and want to hand a task off from a GitHub pull request or a Slack thread and come back later; pick Jules if you live in the Google world.
El Crítico6.56.3Codex cloud — Each environment can be granted internet access and holds your secrets, so the agent is a container with your credentials and a network policy you configured once and forgot.
El Profesor6.87.3Ona — Verification has a real substrate: the agent works inside an environment carrying your toolchain, permissions and network access, so a claim can be executed rather than argued.
La Inversora8.07.8Codex cloud — OpenAI folded the Codex app into the ChatGPT desktop app in July 2026 and sells Pro from $100 with 5x or 20x limits; the coding agent is a retention feature for the subscription.
La Jefa7.07.3Ona — Core starts at $20 a month with 80 to 2,200 compute units and top-ups from $10 per 40, and Enterprise runs inside our VPC with kernel-level policy and audit trails.
El Hacker3.54.5Ona — Closed source and cloud-only, but it speaks MCP and a Codex subscription can be attached to a Core plan, which is the one string I get to hold.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.