agentboards.org
Compare/Codex cloud vs Background Agents (Open-Inspect)

Codex cloudvsBackground Agents (Open-Inspect)

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codex cloud
OpenAI · Autonomous SWE
#55
Panel
6.5
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.8
Longevity
7.0

“Ships models named Sol, Terra and Luna, so your pull request is now reviewed by a planetarium.”

Background Agents (Open-Inspect)
Cole Murray · Autonomous SWE
#126OSS
Panel
6.4
6 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.7
Longevity
6.0

“It supports multiplayer sessions, so several people can now watch the same agent make the same decision in real time.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodex cloudBackground Agents (Open-Inspect)
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runscloud, sandboxsandbox, cloud
Platformsweblinux, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoThe Browser capability and cloud browser belong to ChatGPT/ChatGPT Work, not to Codex cloud chats, whose containers only get configurable HTTP internet access (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/cloud/internet-access). Yes
Sandboxed executionYesEach chat gets its own container from the `universal` image, cached for up to 12 hours (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/environments/cloud-environment). Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneGPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 LunaAnthropic Claude, OpenAI Codex, xAI Grok, OpenCode Zen
Bring your own modelNoThe Amazon Bedrock model-provider path is explicitly limited to local Codex surfaces and states that Codex cloud is not available (https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/amazon-bedrock). Yes
Local modelsNoCloud chats run on OpenAI-hosted models only; the `model_provider` config that redirects inference is read by local clients, not by cloud containers. No
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoCloud tasks require a ChatGPT plan; an OpenAI API key does not unlock them. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryMIT
GitHub starsn/a3,303

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodex cloudBackground Agents (Open-Inspect)Pick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.36.8Codex cloud — Pick Codex cloud if you already pay for ChatGPT and want to hand a task off from a GitHub pull request or a Slack thread and come back later; pick Jules if you live in the Google world.
El Crítico6.56.0Codex cloud — Each environment can be granted internet access and holds your secrets, so the agent is a container with your credentials and a network policy you configured once and forgot.
El Profesor6.87.0Background Agents (Open-Inspect) — Pull requests carry commit attribution back to the person who prompted the run, which preserves provenance through the artefact rather than only in a log.
La Inversora8.06.3Codex cloud — OpenAI folded the Codex app into the ChatGPT desktop app in July 2026 and sells Pro from $100 with 5x or 20x limits; the coding agent is a retention feature for the subscription.
La Jefa7.05.3Codex cloud — Business is $20 per user, $1,200 a month for sixty, extra usage is credits priced per model, and there is an Enterprise tier, the shape procurement already knows from ChatGPT.
El Hacker3.57.3Background Agents (Open-Inspect) — MIT and self-hosted end to end, with agents working inside full environments that carry the language runtimes, version control and an editor, and no protocol client anywhere.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.