Command CodevsFuXi
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Command Code
Command Code · Terminal agent
#86MCP
Panel
5.30 spec wins
- Reliability
- 4.8
- Usefulness
- 6.2
- Cost
- 5.8
- Longevity
- 4.3
“The free tier gives you between ten and forty dollars of credits, a range that suggests the pricing page is also still deciding.”
FuXi
FUXI · Terminal agent
#90MCP
Panel
5.85 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.0
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 7.3
- Longevity
- 4.3
“More than fifty built-in tools in one binary, which is either thoroughness or the longest permission prompt in this category.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Command Code | FuXi |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Terminal agent | Terminal agent |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes/commit and /review create commits, review code and open pull requests. |
| Browser control | No | Yes |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | Yes | Yes`fuxi setup-token` is documented specifically for headless and CI use. |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.6, DeepSeek, Qwen, MiniMax, Kimi, GLM | any OpenAI-compatible provider, Anthropic, Gemini, Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | No | YesA custom base_url is documented through config, the FUXI_BASE_URL environment variable and the -b/--base-url flag, which covers a locally hosted OpenAI-compatible server. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | subscription | byok |
| Starts at | $1/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | YesThe docs list provider options for bringing your own account, and a $15 Provider plan sits alongside the credit plans. | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | proprietary | proprietary |
| GitHub stars | n/a | 3,350 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Command Code | FuXi | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.3 | 6.5 | FuXi — Pick it if you want one downloaded binary and no runtime to install; pick OpenCode when you would rather your terminal agent be something you can read. |
| El Crítico | 5.5 | 5.3 | Command Code — The unattended path carries a --yolo flag, and the same tool commits to worktrees and opens pull requests, so a bad run does not stop at the filesystem. |
| El Profesor | 5.3 | 6.3 | FuXi — Classifying shell commands by parsing them into a syntax tree is the correct method; pattern matching on command strings is what everyone else does and it is defeated by quoting. |
| La Inversora | 5.0 | 5.3 | FuXi — A free binary with an optional managed model service is a funnel, and three thousand stars on a repository that ships no code is a marketing result. |
| La Jefa | 4.8 | 5.0 | FuXi — Zero licence cost for sixty and a documented token command for headless runs, but a one-month-old preview from a vendor with no company details is not a supplier. |
| El Hacker | 5.0 | 6.5 | FuXi — Closed source, but FUXI_BASE_URL or the -b flag points it at any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which includes the server running on my own machine. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.