agentboards.org
Compare/Continue CLI vs pi

Continue CLIvspi

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Continue CLI
Continue · Terminal agent
#24OSSMCP
Panel
6.4
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
8.0
Longevity
5.2

“It installs by piping a URL straight into your shell, then politely asks permission before it touches a single file.”

pi
Earendil Inc. · Terminal agent
#9OSS
Panel
6.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.3
Longevity
7.0

“A coding agent that ships themes, which is the first time anyone has cared what the terminal looks like while a file gets deleted.”

Spec by spec

SpecContinue CLIpi
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoThe docs describe running the CLI inside a Docker container, not sandboxing the agent in one. No
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
Backboneany provider configured in config.yaml, AnthropicOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenRouter, llama.cpp
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesThe CLI reads the same ~/.continue/config.yaml provider schema as the IDE extensions, including a custom apiBase, so any local server can be configured; the CLI pages defer to that reference rather than naming Ollama or LM Studio. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars36,084111,339

Which one would each critic pick

CriticContinue CLIpiPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.87.5pi — Pick pi if you want a terminal agent small enough to read in an afternoon and extend in TypeScript; pick OpenCode if your workflow already depends on MCP servers.
El Crítico6.36.8pi — Extensions are TypeScript modules loaded into the agent's own process, so a package is a supply chain, and the install line already says --ignore-scripts.
El Profesor6.57.3pi — A unified LLM API, an agent loop, a TUI and a CLI in one monorepo; sessions branch into a tree with compaction that summarises abandoned branches; no benchmark is published.
La Inversora5.35.5pi — Earendil Inc. holds 101,000 stars and an MIT agent with no price, no hosted tier and no revenue line on the page; the crowd is the asset and it is unmonetised.
La Jefa6.05.5Continue CLI — Zero licence for sixty and a single-shot flag that fits our pipelines, but sign-in goes to a vendor account by default and nothing on the row mentions SSO or audit.
El Hacker7.88.5pi — MIT TypeScript, extensions that add tools, commands and UI, /llama for llama.cpp on my box, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in the environment, and packages to share it all.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.