agentboards.org
Compare/Continue CLI vs Warp

Continue CLIvsWarp

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Continue CLI
Continue · Terminal agent
#24OSSMCP
Panel
6.4
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
8.0
Longevity
5.2

“It installs by piping a URL straight into your shell, then politely asks permission before it touches a single file.”

Warp
Warp · Terminal agent
#20OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
5.5
Longevity
7.2

“Scored 75.8 on SWE-bench Verified with a best-of-k wrapper, which is also how most of us get through code review.”

Spec by spec

SpecContinue CLIWarp
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoYesComputer Use environments bundle Chromium plus the Playwright CLI and can attach over CDP, so the agent navigates, clicks, fills forms and reads pages.
Sandboxed executionNoThe docs describe running the CLI inside a Docker container, not sandboxing the agent in one. YesCloud runs execute in a containerized sandbox built from a Docker image with no access to the local machine; local interactive sessions are not sandboxed.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
Backboneany provider configured in config.yaml, AnthropicGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, open-weight models via Fireworks
Bring your own modelYesYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, an internal gateway) plus BYO Anthropic, OpenAI or Google keys and custom routers.
Local modelsYesThe CLI reads the same ~/.continue/config.yaml provider schema as the IDE extensions, including a custom apiBase, so any local server can be configured; the CLI pages defer to that reference rather than naming Ollama or LM Studio. YesOllama, LM Studio, vLLM and llama.cpp are supported through the custom inference endpoint, but only when exposed at a public URL via a tunnel, since localhost and private addresses are rejected.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
GitHub stars36,08465,338

Which one would each critic pick

CriticContinue CLIWarpPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.87.3Warp — Use Warp if you want an agent in the terminal you already open every morning, with a standalone CLI and cloud agents when you outgrow it, and read the credit table before you pick a plan.
El Crítico6.36.0Continue CLI — Tool safety here is a command-line flag: one auto switch turns the gate off, and the row records no container isolation behind it.
El Profesor6.56.0Continue CLI — One configuration schema serves both the terminal agent and the editor extensions, which is the correct reuse; the command-line documentation defers to it rather than restating it.
La Inversora5.36.8Warp — Warp spent years building a terminal, open-sourced it under AGPL, and is now selling credits and $200 Max plans on top of it; the terminal is the distribution, the agent is the business.
La Jefa6.06.0no preference
El Hacker7.86.8Continue CLI — Apache-2.0 with the whole thing in a public monorepo, and a provider block that takes a custom apiBase, which is how my own server gets in.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.