agentboards.org
Compare/Crush vs Snow CLI

CrushvsSnow CLI

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Crush
Charm · Terminal agent
#25OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.3
Longevity
6.2

“Has a --yolo flag, auto-discovers your local llama.cpp, and a license with MIT in the name that is not MIT yet.”

Snow CLI
MayDay-wpf · Terminal agent
#99OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
8.3
Longevity
4.7

“It lets you customise the status line, which is historically the feature that decides which agent a developer actually adopts.”

Spec by spec

SpecCrushSnow CLI
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoThe built-in tools stop at web_fetch, web_search and download; there is no browser, CDP or Playwright tool. Yes
Sandboxed executionNoShell and edit calls are guarded by permission prompts (or skipped with --yolo), with no container or OS-level isolation. No
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYesSub-agent configuration and a team mode for parallel task execution are both documented.
Headless / CI modeYes`crush run` executes a single non-interactive prompt, reads stdin and supports --quiet for scripts. YesA documented headless mode supports scripted conversations and third-party tool integration.
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, any OpenAI-compatible or Anthropic-compatible providerOpenAI, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesOllama, LM Studio, llama.cpp and MLX providers are auto-discovered, and any OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible base_url can be added. No
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseFSL-1.1-MITApache-2.0
GitHub stars28,4441,063

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCrushSnow CLIPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.36.8Crush — Crush is the terminal agent to pick if you want LSP-grade context and a Charm-quality interface with your own keys, and the one to read the license on before you fork it.
El Crítico6.36.0Crush — A --yolo flag on an agent with no sandbox means a headless run is your shell with nobody watching; the LSP context is the reason to read past it.
El Profesor6.57.0Snow CLI — Definition and outline tools are backed by a language server, so symbol lookup is resolved by a parser rather than approximated by text search.
La Inversora5.86.3Snow CLI — 1,063 stars, one maintainer and no price: an unusually complete product built as a gift, which is the least predictable supply arrangement there is.
La Jefa5.85.5Crush — Free with our own keys, Bedrock and Vertex built in, a --yolo flag that needs a policy, and a source-available license legal will want to read; approved with conditions.
El Hacker7.57.3Crush — Reads my LSPs, finds my llama.cpp server on its own, MCP in a JSON file, a --yolo flag, and a license that keeps me from forking it today; close to great, grudgingly.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.