agentboards.org
Compare/cubic vs DeepSource

cubicvsDeepSource

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

cubic
cubic · Code review agent
#88MCP
Panel
6.0
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.5
Longevity
6.0

“The free tier is twenty pull request reviews a month, which is either a whole team or one Dependabot.”

DeepSource
DeepSource · Code review agent
#64MCP
Panel
6.1
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
5.0
Longevity
6.8

“It detects committed secrets, which is mostly a tool for finding out which of your colleagues commits secrets.”

Spec by spec

SpeccubicDeepSource
Architecture
CategoryCode review agentCode review agent
Runscloud, sandboxcloud
Platformsweb, macos, linux, windowsweb
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverYesYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoNo
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYesAutofix commits corrections back to the pull request.
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionYesNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Claude CodeAnthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini
Bring your own modelNoYesBYOK for AI Review, with inference on your own infrastructure, is an Enterprise-tier feature.
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelseatmixed
Starts at$30/mo$24/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticcubicDeepSourcePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.5cubic — Pick cubic if you are on GitHub and want a reviewer whose CLI also runs on uncommitted changes from inside Cursor, Claude Code or Codex; pick Bito if you are on GitLab or Bitbucket.
El Crítico6.56.0cubic — Background agents give the GitHub App write access so the reviewer can commit fixes; the docs limit that scope to fix branches and promise never to push to main.
El Profesor6.56.5no preference
La Inversora6.37.5DeepSource — A $24 per-user subscription with review metered per processed line on top, and bring-your-own-inference held back for the enterprise tier, is a well-designed expansion ladder.
La Jefa6.06.3DeepSource — Sixty seats at $24 billed yearly is $1,440 a month, and the annual review credit of $100 covers roughly one week before the per-line meter starts.
El Hacker4.04.0no preference

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.