agentboards.org
Compare/Dapr Agents vs OpenAI Agents SDK

Dapr AgentsvsOpenAI Agents SDK

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Dapr Agents
Dapr · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
0 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
7.0
Longevity
7.5

“It reaches more than fifty enterprise data sources, which is fifty new ways to be told your credentials expired.”

OpenAI Agents SDK
OpenAI · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
7.1
6 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
7.2
Longevity
7.0

“Billed as the production-ready upgrade of Swarm, which tells you what Swarm was.”

Spec by spec

SpecDapr AgentsOpenAI Agents SDK
Architecture
CategoryAgent frameworkAgent framework
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoYes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, AnthropicGPT, any LiteLLM-supported model
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars75329,799

Which one would each critic pick

CriticDapr AgentsOpenAI Agents SDKPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.87.0OpenAI Agents SDK — Pick the OpenAI Agents SDK if you build on OpenAI models and want the fewest primitives that still cover delegation; pick the Claude Agent SDK if the agent you are building edits code.
El Crítico6.36.8OpenAI Agents SDK — The escape hatch is LiteLLM but the hosted tools do not follow you through it: web search, file search, code interpreter, computer use, shell and apply-patch only exist on OpenAI's side.
El Profesor7.56.5Dapr Agents — Agent runs are expressed as durable workflows, which imposes a replay discipline: the orchestration must be deterministic and every model call has to sit behind an activity boundary.
La Inversora7.07.5OpenAI Agents SDK — A free SDK from the vendor that sells the tokens is distribution, not a business; the question is whether OpenAI's own agent products will compete with the developers it recruited.
La Jefa7.07.3OpenAI Agents SDK — As a dependency it costs nothing per seat, is maintained by the vendor already on our invoice, and sends traces to that vendor's dashboard by default, which is a retention question.
El Hacker7.37.5OpenAI Agents SDK — MIT, pip install openai-agents, MCPServerStreamableHttp from agents.mcp, and LiteLLM means my local Ollama box counts as a provider; I can read the whole loop and fork it.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.