agentboards.org
Compare/DeepSource vs Sourcery

DeepSourcevsSourcery

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

DeepSource
DeepSource · Code review agent
#64MCP
Panel
6.1
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
5.0
Longevity
6.8

“It detects committed secrets, which is mostly a tool for finding out which of your colleagues commits secrets.”

Sourcery
Sourcery · Code review agent
#78
Panel
6.0
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
6.3
Longevity
6.2

“Draws a diagram of your code changes, which is more attention than the changes usually get.”

Spec by spec

SpecDeepSourceSourcery
Architecture
CategoryCode review agentCode review agent
Runscloudcloud
Platformswebweb, macos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoNo
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsYesAutofix commits corrections back to the pull request. Yes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneAnthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google GeminiOpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI
Bring your own modelYesBYOK for AI Review, with inference on your own infrastructure, is an Enterprise-tier feature. Yes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedseat
Starts at$24/mo$12/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesNo
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticDeepSourceSourceryPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.57.0Sourcery — Pick Sourcery if you want the same reviewer on uncommitted changes in your editor and on the pull request; pick CodeRabbit if you only need the bot on the PR.
El Crítico6.06.5Sourcery — The status check that can block a merge exists on GitHub only, so the same review is a gate on one host and a comment on the other.
El Profesor6.56.0DeepSource — Deterministic analysers and model agents produce findings into the same comment stream with no published split between them, and no precision figure for either.
La Inversora7.56.5DeepSource — A $24 per-user subscription with review metered per processed line on top, and bring-your-own-inference held back for the enterprise tier, is a well-designed expansion ladder.
La Jefa6.36.3no preference
El Hacker4.04.0no preference

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.