agentboards.org
Compare/Devin vs OpenHands

DevinvsOpenHands

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Devin
Cognition · Autonomous SWE
#139MCP
Panel
5.3
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
4.3
Longevity
5.5

“Replaced ACUs with credits in April 2026, so now the meter runs in a unit you already understand.”

OpenHands
OpenHands (All Hands AI) · Autonomous SWE
#8OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
5 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
7.3
Cost
6.7
Longevity
7.0

“Scores 71.8% on SWE-bench Verified and still needs you to install Docker first.”

Spec by spec

SpecDevinOpenHands
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runscloud, sandbox, locallocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsweb, macos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesCloud sessions ship a first-party interactive Browser tool alongside the shell and IDE, with saved browser profiles for authenticated sites (https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/browser-auth). YesA first-party browser tool driven through the SDK's browser-use guide, with session recording (https://docs.openhands.dev/sdk/guides/agent-browser-use).
Sandboxed executionYesCloud sessions run on a dedicated Devin machine built from environment blueprints and snapshots, and the Devin CLI adds OS-level isolation locally (https://docs.devin.ai/cli/sandbox). YesDocker is the default sandbox runtime, with Apptainer, remote and API sandboxes as alternatives (https://docs.openhands.dev/openhands/usage/sandboxes/overview).
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneUndisclosed (Cognition-managed models)Claude, GPT, Gemini, Qwen, Kimi, any OpenAI-compatible model
Bring your own modelNoA cross-provider model picker (`--model` / `/model` / config `agent.model`) selects between Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Cognition and open-source models, but every one of them is served by Cognition: the CLI model reference documents no API key, base URL, gateway, Bedrock, Vertex or Azure deployment of your own, matching pricing.byok = false. YesAny LiteLLM-supported provider, plus AWS Bedrock, Azure, Google and enterprise LLM gateways, are configurable per profile (https://docs.openhands.dev/openhands/usage/llms/litellm-proxy).
Local modelsNoNo base URL, gateway or local endpoint setting exists in the Devin CLI config reference (https://docs.devin.ai/cli/reference/configuration/config-file). YesDocumented end to end for LM Studio and Ollama, and any OpenAI-compatible base URL can be set in advanced LLM settings.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyNoUsage is billed in Cognition ACUs and no LLM provider key can be supplied; Devin Outposts (https://docs.devin.ai/cloud/outposts/overview) only moves session compute onto your own machines. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryMIT
GitHub starsn/a89,764

Which one would each critic pick

CriticDevinOpenHandsPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.37.3OpenHands — The open autonomous agent to run when you want a sandbox and a pull request instead of a chat; expect setup and a token bill on real repos.
El Crítico5.37.0OpenHands — The sandbox is real and the leaderboard entry is public, which makes the bill the failure mode: autonomy reads until it stops, and you pay for the reading.
El Profesor5.07.5OpenHands — A sandboxed agent with a public, maintainer-checked SWE-bench Verified entry; the number is comparable, which is rarer than the number being high.
La Inversora6.85.8Devin — Well funded, acquisitive, and repricing in public; the Windsurf purchase bought distribution, and the April 2026 plan change says the ACU math was not working.
La Jefa5.85.8no preference
El Hacker2.59.0OpenHands — MIT, Docker sandbox, any OpenAI-compatible model including local, MCP in a TOML file, a Python SDK; I can run the whole thing on my own iron.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.