agentboards.org
Compare/DevoxxGenie vs Kilo Code

DevoxxGenievsKilo Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

DevoxxGenie
Devoxx · IDE extension
#21OSSMCP
Panel
7.7
0 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
8.8
Longevity
7.3

“It ships a kanban board backed by Backlog.md, so your agent can now be blocked on a ticket like everybody else.”

Kilo Code
Kilo Code (Anaconda) · IDE extension
#26OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
7.2
Cost
7.0
Longevity
5.8

“A fork of Roo Code carrying a fork of OpenCode, acquired by Anaconda, so the dependency tree finally has a parent.”

Spec by spec

SpecDevoxxGenieKilo Code
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesAgent Mode ships a run_command tool alongside its file and search tools. Yes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoYesA Playwright-backed browser tool that navigates, clicks, fills forms, drags and screenshots after each action; it needs a high-capability agentic model to work reliably.
Sandboxed executionNoYesCloud Agents run in isolated Linux containers, and the local CLI has an opt-in OS-level sandbox using macOS Seatbelt via sandbox-exec or Linux bubblewrap (not available on Windows).
Multi-agent orchestrationYesAgent Mode runs parallel sub-agents, and ACP and CLI runners let it drive Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Kimi and Copilot as external agents. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYes`kilo run --auto` auto-approves permissions for fully non-interactive CI/CD runs.
Models
BackboneOllama, LMStudio, GPT4All, Llama.cpp, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Mistral, Groq, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Amazon BedrockClaude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars68327,467

Which one would each critic pick

CriticDevoxxGenieKilo CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo8.07.3DevoxxGenie — Pick DevoxxGenie if you live in IntelliJ and want an agent that edits code for free; pick Firebender if you would rather pay someone to answer the phone when it breaks.
El Crítico7.06.0DevoxxGenie — The run_command tool executes on your machine inside the IDE process, with no isolation layer described between a generated command and your shell.
El Profesor8.05.5DevoxxGenie — Gitleaks, OpenGrep and Trivy are wired in as agent tools and their findings become prioritised backlog tasks, which grounds the work queue in analysers rather than in the model's opinion.
La Inversora7.36.3DevoxxGenie — The publisher is a conference organisation, not a company, and it has shipped since April 2024 with 679 stars. Nobody here needs an exit, which is the point.
La Jefa7.36.8DevoxxGenie — Zero across sixty seats and installed from a marketplace my desktop policy already permits, with no console, no directory sync and no audit trail behind it.
El Hacker8.87.3DevoxxGenie — MIT, and five local runtimes are first-class providers, so the whole loop runs with nothing leaving the machine. MCP servers install from a marketplace over stdio or HTTP and SSE.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.