DevoxxGenievsZoo Code
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
DevoxxGenie
Devoxx · IDE extension
#21OSSMCP
Panel
7.70 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.2
- Usefulness
- 7.5
- Cost
- 8.8
- Longevity
- 7.3
“It ships a kanban board backed by Backlog.md, so your agent can now be blocked on a ticket like everybody else.”
Zoo Code
Zoo Code Org · IDE extension
#16OSSMCP
Panel
7.51 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.0
- Usefulness
- 7.5
- Cost
- 8.5
- Longevity
- 7.2
“The original team wound down the extension to focus on Roomote, so the fork is now the product and the product is now a memory.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | DevoxxGenie | Zoo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | IDE extension | IDE extension |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | YesAgent Mode ships a run_command tool alongside its file and search tools. | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | No | No |
| Browser control | No | NoThe documented tool set covers read, edit, execute, image and workflow tools; no browser tool is listed. |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | YesAgent Mode runs parallel sub-agents, and ACP and CLI runners let it drive Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Kimi and Copilot as external agents. | YesThe Orchestrator delegates subtasks with parallel coordination, per-subtask provider profiles and parent/child task recovery. |
| Headless / CI mode | No | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Ollama, LMStudio, GPT4All, Llama.cpp, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Mistral, Groq, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Amazon Bedrock | Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, Grok, MiniMax, Zoo Gateway, Ollama, LM Studio |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | Yes | Yes |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | 683 | 1,937 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | DevoxxGenie | Zoo Code | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 8.0 | 7.8 | DevoxxGenie — Pick DevoxxGenie if you live in IntelliJ and want an agent that edits code for free; pick Firebender if you would rather pay someone to answer the phone when it breaks. |
| El Crítico | 7.0 | 7.0 | no preference |
| El Profesor | 8.0 | 7.0 | DevoxxGenie — Gitleaks, OpenGrep and Trivy are wired in as agent tools and their findings become prioritised backlog tasks, which grounds the work queue in analysers rather than in the model's opinion. |
| La Inversora | 7.3 | 7.5 | Zoo Code — 1,793 stars in four months and a gateway selling pay-as-you-go credits with no subscription. That is a fork with a revenue line, which is rarer than the fork. |
| La Jefa | 7.3 | 7.5 | Zoo Code — Zero across sixty seats, and multi-root path controls plus per-mode server restrictions give me something to actually configure, which almost nothing free on this board does. |
| El Hacker | 8.8 | 8.5 | DevoxxGenie — MIT, and five local runtimes are first-class providers, so the whole loop runs with nothing leaving the machine. MCP servers install from a marketplace over stdio or HTTP and SSE. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.