DifyvsLangGraph
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Dify
LangGenius · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
7.71 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.5
- Usefulness
- 7.8
- Cost
- 7.5
- Longevity
- 7.8
“It integrates hundreds of models, which is one very effective way to avoid ever choosing one.”
LangGraph
LangChain · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
7.63 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.7
- Usefulness
- 7.3
- Cost
- 7.3
- Longevity
- 8.0
“You do not need LangChain to use LangGraph, says the LangChain documentation.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Dify | LangGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent framework | Agent framework |
| Runs | local, cloud | local, cloud |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows, web | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | No | No |
| Multi-file edits | No | No |
| Git operations | No | No |
| Browser control | No | YesNot in LangGraph itself: browser control comes from LangChain's own PlayWrightBrowserToolkit (Click, Navigate, ExtractText and related tools) in langchain-community, bound as agent tools. |
| Sandboxed execution | No | NoThe first-party langchain-sandbox package gave LangGraph agents a Pyodide/Deno PyodideSandboxTool but was archived in January 2026 with production use discouraged, so nothing current ships. |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | No | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | any | any LangChain chat model, OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | Yes | Yes |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | mixed | byok |
| Starts at | n/a | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | Dify Open Source License (Apache-2.0 with additional conditions) | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 157,708 | 42,591 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Dify | LangGraph | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 8.0 | 7.8 | Dify — Pick Dify when people who are not engineers need to build and change LLM applications; pick n8n if the hard part is connecting systems rather than handling documents and prompts. |
| El Crítico | 7.3 | 7.3 | no preference |
| El Profesor | 7.8 | 7.5 | Dify — Retrieval, model management and orchestration are separated into distinct subsystems, and finished workflows are exposed over OpenAPI, so an application becomes a callable service. |
| La Inversora | 8.0 | 7.8 | Dify — One hundred and fifty thousand stars is the largest open-source distribution in this class, and LangGenius monetises it with annual cloud plans from $590 rather than a meter. |
| La Jefa | 7.3 | 7.0 | Dify — Self-hosting costs infrastructure and an owner; the hosted Team plan is $1,590 a year, which is trivial, and everything my security review needs sits in the tier priced by conversation. |
| El Hacker | 7.8 | 8.3 | LangGraph — MIT, pip install -U langgraph, a checkpointer interface I can implement against my own Postgres, Ollama through ChatOllama, MCP tools with one extra install, and the hosted platform is optional. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.