Fitten CodevsGigaCode
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Fitten Code
Fitten Tech · IDE extension
#223
Panel
4.90 spec wins
- Reliability
- 3.7
- Usefulness
- 4.5
- Cost
- 7.0
- Longevity
- 4.3
“Its agent is called Agent Chat, its warnings are called Signal, and its price is called free.”
GigaCode
Sber · IDE extension
#162
Panel
5.32 spec wins
- Reliability
- 4.3
- Usefulness
- 5.3
- Cost
- 6.2
- Longevity
- 5.5
“The bank ships GigaChat inside GigaIDE by way of GigaCode, and the prefix is the entire product strategy.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Fitten Code | GigaCode |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | IDE extension | IDE extension |
| Runs | cloud | local, cloud |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | No |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | No | YesThrough GigaCode CLI, the terminal agent that works against a local repository. |
| Multi-file edits | YesFitten describes project context understanding and multi-step task execution; the vendor does not document explicit multi-file diffs. | Yes |
| Git operations | No | No |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | No |
| Headless / CI mode | No | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Fitten Code | GigaChat, GLM, MiniMax, Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen |
| Bring your own model | No | No |
| Local models | No | YesOnly in the on-premises edition, which Sber sells for organisations that need the assistant inside their own perimeter. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | free | mixed |
| Starts at | $0/mo | n/a |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | No | No |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | proprietary | proprietary |
| GitHub stars | n/a | n/a |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Fitten Code | GigaCode | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.0 | 6.3 | GigaCode — Pick it if your repositories already live on this vendor's platform; pick SourceCraft Code Assistant when you want the same regional fit from a different host. |
| El Crítico | 4.8 | 5.5 | GigaCode — Multi-level guardrails filter both the prompts going in and the responses coming out, so a refusal arrives with no explanation and no route around it. |
| El Profesor | 5.5 | 6.0 | GigaCode — A model factory routes across 35 or more open models, which means behaviour varies by whichever one served a request and nothing documents the routing. |
| La Inversora | 4.8 | 6.0 | GigaCode — A bank's platform play, free for individuals and 1,699 roubles a month for business, with its own models underneath so the margin stays in the group. |
| La Jefa | 4.8 | 4.5 | Fitten Code — Sixty seats at zero is exactly why it spreads before anyone asks me, and there is no contract, no retention policy and no identity integration behind it. |
| El Hacker | 3.5 | 3.8 | GigaCode — Closed source, no key of my own, no tool protocol, and the local option is an on-premises licence I have to buy rather than a binary I can run. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.