GitarvsMira
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Gitar
Sonar · Code review agent
#67
Panel
6.11 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.7
- Cost
- 5.8
- Longevity
- 6.0
“Free for OSI-licensed public repositories, so it will fix your side project and invoice your employer.”
Mira
Miracode · Code review agent
#69OSS
Panel
7.03 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.8
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 8.5
- Longevity
- 6.2
“It includes org-wide package search, so you can find every repository that installed the dependency you now regret.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Gitar | Mira |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Code review agent | Code review agent |
| Runs | cloud | local, cloud |
| Platforms | web | linux, web |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | No |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | No | No |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | No |
| Git operations | YesGitar commits fixes to the branch and can auto-approve or block merges on the Pro tier. | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | No |
| Headless / CI mode | Yes | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | undisclosed | OpenRouter, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, Llama, vLLM, Ollama, Together, Groq, Fireworks, AWS Bedrock |
| Bring your own model | Yes"Bring Your Own LLM API Key" is listed as an Enterprise-tier feature only. | Yes |
| Local models | No | YesvLLM and Ollama are named among the supported OpenAI-compatible endpoints. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | seat | byok |
| Starts at | $20/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | Yes |
| License | proprietary | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | n/a | 354 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Gitar | Mira | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.8 | 7.3 | Mira — Pick it if your team already ignores a review bot and you want the honest fix; pick CodeRabbit if you would rather someone else ran the service. |
| El Crítico | 5.8 | 6.5 | Mira — The learning loop synthesises rules from your merged history, so it learns what your team approved rather than what your team should have approved. |
| El Profesor | 6.5 | 7.0 | Mira — Review context is drawn from a codebase index rather than the diff alone, which is correct, and no precision or recall figure accompanies it. |
| La Inversora | 7.0 | 6.3 | Gitar — The ownership question is already answered: Gitar is joining Sonar, so this is now a feature inside a code-quality suite rather than a standalone bet. |
| La Jefa | 6.5 | 7.3 | Mira — The dashboard reports cost per repository and per model, which is the number finance asks for and no review vendor has ever given me. |
| El Hacker | 4.0 | 7.8 | Mira — Apache-2.0, vulnerability scanning included in the self-hosted build, and per-provider quirks kept in config rather than code, so vLLM or Ollama is one line. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.