agentboards.org
Compare/goose vs Poolside

goosevsPoolside

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

goose
Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) · Terminal agent
#13OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
6.8
Longevity
7.3

“Block gave it to the Linux Foundation, which is the one exit strategy that cannot be un-acquired.”

Poolside
poolside · Terminal agent
#15MCP
Panel
6.9
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.5
Longevity
7.2

“One of its three network policies is named unsafe-allow-all, which is at least the most clearly labelled decision on this board.”

Spec by spec

SpecgoosePoolside
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, sandbox, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documented1M tokens on Laguna S 2.1, 256k on XS 2.1 and M.1
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe built-in Computer Controller extension drives macOS apps including the browser through the Peekaboo CLI, rather than via a dedicated CDP or Playwright tool. NoWeb search and fetch are documented; there is no DOM-level browser automation.
Sandboxed executionYes`goose session|run --container <id>` executes extensions inside an existing Docker container; goose itself runs unsandboxed on the host otherwise. YesTool commands run inside a container on your machine and need a local Docker engine; network policy is off, allow-list or unsafe-allow-all, enforced through a proxy container.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes`pool exec --prompt ... --output json` with POOLSIDE_API_KEY, plus a documented GitHub Actions integration.
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama (local), OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Amazon BedrockLaguna S 2.1, Laguna XS 2.1, Laguna M.1
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYesDocumented local-run guides for Ollama and vLLM on Metal, plus full on-premises and air-gapped deployment.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesNo
LicenseApache-2.0proprietary
GitHub stars54,860n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticgoosePoolsidePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.36.8goose — A free, open, local agent under the Linux Foundation that talks to any model and any MCP server; you will spend a weekend tuning it and then own it.
El Crítico6.56.5no preference
El Profesor6.56.5no preference
La Inversora5.37.0Poolside — Training your own models and selling deployments into other people's data centres is a capital-intensive bet on the one segment that cannot buy from a lab directly.
La Jefa5.87.0Poolside — It runs inside our own network, including air-gapped, on the Kubernetes platforms we already operate, and the enterprise price is a sales conversation.
El Hacker9.37.5goose — Rust, Apache-2.0, every extension an MCP server in YAML, Ollama on my box, a foundation instead of a vendor; this is the one I would build if I had the time.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.