agentboards.org
Compare/goose vs Qwen Code

goosevsQwen Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

goose
Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) · Terminal agent
#13OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
6.8
Longevity
7.3

“Block gave it to the Linux Foundation, which is the one exit strategy that cannot be un-acquired.”

Qwen Code
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) · Terminal agent
#19OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.3
Longevity
6.3

“Ships a Java SDK, which tells you precisely which enterprises Alibaba expects to pay for it.”

Spec by spec

SpecgooseQwen Code
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe built-in Computer Controller extension drives macOS apps including the browser through the Peekaboo CLI, rather than via a dedicated CDP or Playwright tool. YesThe first-party @qwen-code/chrome-bridge extension tunnels cdp_* frames from the `qwen serve` daemon into chrome.debugger so the agent drives a real Chrome tab, but console/network/screenshot/click tools need an external CDP MCP adapter set via QWEN_CDP_MCP_COMMAND, since none is bundled.
Sandboxed executionYes`goose session|run --container <id>` executes extensions inside an existing Docker container; goose itself runs unsandboxed on the host otherwise. YesTwo real isolation modes - macOS Seatbelt via sandbox-exec (default `permissive-open` profile) and container-based Docker/Podman with a published sandbox image (https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/features/sandbox/).
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama (local), OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Amazon BedrockQwen3-Coder, OpenAI-compatible, Claude, Gemini
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesNo
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars54,86028,271

Which one would each critic pick

CriticgooseQwen CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.0goose — A free, open, local agent under the Linux Foundation that talks to any model and any MCP server; you will spend a weekend tuning it and then own it.
El Crítico6.56.3goose — A local agent with terminal execution whose Docker isolation is a --container flag you have to remember, a foundation instead of a vendor, and a bill that depends entirely on which model you point it at.
El Profesor6.56.0goose — Extensions-as-MCP is the cleanest extensibility model on the board; the agent's capability is a feature list with no number attached.
La Inversora5.36.8Qwen Code — Alibaba killed the Qwen OAuth free tier on 2026-04-15, the classic subsidy-to-subscription turn, and 27,000 stars now have to pay someone.
La Jefa5.85.8no preference
El Hacker9.38.8goose — Rust, Apache-2.0, every extension an MCP server in YAML, Ollama on my box, a foundation instead of a vendor; this is the one I would build if I had the time.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.