agentboards.org
Compare/goose vs Zero

goosevsZero

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

goose
Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) · Terminal agent
#13OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
6.8
Longevity
7.3

“Block gave it to the Linux Foundation, which is the one exit strategy that cannot be un-acquired.”

Zero
Gitlawb · Terminal agent
#6OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
8.2
Longevity
6.2

“It accepts image input in a terminal, a sentence that would have ended a career in 2019.”

Spec by spec

SpecgooseZero
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe built-in Computer Controller extension drives macOS apps including the browser through the Peekaboo CLI, rather than via a dedicated CDP or Playwright tool. YesBrowser and terminal control helpers ship with the npm and release builds; source builds need those helper binaries on PATH or configured in local-control settings.
Sandboxed executionYes`goose session|run --container <id>` executes extensions inside an existing Docker container; goose itself runs unsandboxed on the host otherwise. NoZero ships a native Linux sandbox helper using seccomp rather than Docker; source builds must build the `zero-linux-sandbox` helper separately.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes`zero exec` returns exit codes and has a documented GitHub Action recipe.
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama (local), OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Amazon BedrockOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Groq, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Mistral, xAI, Qwen, Kimi, GitHub Models, Fireworks, MiniMax, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars54,8601,688

Which one would each critic pick

CriticgooseZeroPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.56.8Zero — Package builds ship the browser and terminal control helpers; a source build needs those binaries on PATH and expects you to build the Linux sandbox helper separately.
El Profesor6.57.3Zero — Sessions can be resumed or forked, which makes a continuation a controlled variable, and the headless mode emits text, JSON or stream-JSON rather than prose only.
La Inversora5.35.5Zero — A permissively licensed terminal agent from a single publisher, in the most crowded category on this board, with nothing being sold at any point.
La Jefa5.86.8Zero — Nothing to license for sixty, and it is the rare tool that returns meaningful exit codes with a documented continuous integration recipe, so it can gate a build.
El Hacker9.38.5goose — Rust, Apache-2.0, every extension an MCP server in YAML, Ollama on my box, a foundation instead of a vendor; this is the one I would build if I had the time.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.