agentboards.org
Compare/gptme vs Tau

gptmevsTau

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

gptme
Erik Bjäreholt · Terminal agent
#118OSSMCP
Panel
7.4
6 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
9.0
Longevity
6.8

“One environment variable gives every tool call a pleasant sound, which is one way to hear the money leaving.”

Tau
Hugging Face · Terminal agent
#51OSS
Panel
7.2
0 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
6.0
Cost
8.7
Longevity
7.0

“It arrives as three separate packages, so you can adopt only the parts of the agent you actually believe in.”

Spec by spec

SpecgptmeTau
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneanyOpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts atn/a$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars4,4392,894

Which one would each critic pick

CriticgptmeTauPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.57.3gptme — Pick gptme if you want one small agent that works over ssh, in tmux and in a pipeline; pick Aider when the job is editing a repository and nothing else.
El Crítico7.36.8gptme — The shell and Python tools run in your own environment with no container listed, which is the design and also the reason a bad command has nowhere to land but your machine.
El Profesor7.37.8Tau — Three layers with one responsibility each: provider translation, agent primitives, and the application, which is a separation most agents describe and few maintain.
La Inversora6.87.5Tau — 2,607 stars and a real company behind it, publishing a free readable agent: this is developer marketing, and it is the well-executed kind.
La Jefa6.86.5gptme — It runs headless in a pipeline, which is the one capability that makes an agent a workflow component rather than a personal habit, and it costs sixty engineers nothing.
El Hacker8.87.5gptme — MIT, fully local through llama.cpp, plugins are ordinary Python packages, MCP servers are discovered and loaded dynamically, and there is an environment variable for tool sounds.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.