agentboards.org
Compare/Hive vs Supacode

HivevsSupacode

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Hive
tt-a1i · Agent harness
Panel
5.5
0 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
5.8
Longevity
4.7

“There is a paired-phone remote mode, so you can now be the bottleneck from anywhere in the building.”

Supacode
Supabit · Agent harness
Panel
5.3
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
5.5
Longevity
3.5

“The sidebar nests rows by branch and hoists the worktrees that need you, which is triage with considerably better typography.”

Spec by spec

SpecHiveSupacode
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesFiles are changed by the CLI agents Hive runs as PTY processes, not by Hive itself. YesFiles are changed by the coding agent running in each pane; Supacode supplies the worktree, terminal and review surface.
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneClaude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Qwen, HermesClaude, Codex, Copilot
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
LicenseBUSL-1.1unknown
GitHub stars5572,391

Which one would each critic pick

CriticHiveSupacodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.06.0no preference
El Crítico5.05.5Supacode — It knows what each agent is doing by installing hooks into that agent's own configuration, which makes the status display dependent on three other vendors not changing their hook format.
El Profesor5.86.8Supacode — Sessions run inside a separate session daemon rather than as children of the application, so the interface is a viewer over state that outlives it.
La Inversora5.84.8Hive — 497 stars around a wrapper over six other vendors' command-line agents: the coordination is the product, and coordination is the layer with the shortest half-life.
La Jefa4.84.0Hive — No per-seat charge, remote phone access is off unless somebody turns it on, and Windows is rated tier two best-effort, which covers a large part of my fleet badly.
El Hacker6.04.8Hive — It went from Apache-2.0 to BUSL-1.1 at an alpha release, so what I install now is source-available with a five-year wait before the licence becomes an open one.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.