agentboards.org
Compare/Juggler vs Lemma

JugglervsLemma

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Juggler
Juggler · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.1
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.3
Cost
8.3
Longevity
6.2

“It restores your session on relaunch, including the approval dialog you were pointedly ignoring, which is a form of cruelty.”

Lemma
Lemma · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.7
Longevity
6.3

“You install the platform of the future with uv, which is at least honest about which decade the tooling comes from.”

Spec by spec

SpecJugglerLemma
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYesA pod is authored by the coding agent you already use, and pod runs dispatched through Agent Host let that agent change files; Lemma itself edits pod definitions.
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesSessions branch into nested sub-threads, and multiple clients can attach to the same server session at once. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYesWorkflows are triggered by schedules, webhooks, table events, chat or the API, with optional human approval steps.
Models
BackboneClaude Code (CLI or API), OpenAI (Codex plan or API), GitHub Copilot, Gemini, Mistral, Z.ai, Ollama, OpenRouter, DeepSeekClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, any Anthropic-compatible endpoint, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesOllama is listed among the supported providers. YesServer-run agents accept any Anthropic- or OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which covers a self-hosted gateway or a local model.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
GitHub stars604475

Which one would each critic pick

CriticJugglerLemmaPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.56.8Juggler — Pick it when you want to see what the model is doing and change it mid-flight; pick a terminal agent if a scrollback has never actually bothered you.
El Crítico6.86.3Juggler — A session is a collaborative document and several clients can attach to one at once, and nothing documents what happens when two of them edit the context together.
El Profesor7.87.0Juggler — Context items, approvals, thread structure and the raw system prompt are laid out as inspectable columns, so the prompt is an object the user edits rather than an internal detail.
La Inversora6.56.3Juggler — 582 stars, no signup, no hosted tier and no revenue line: a good product with no mechanism by which anybody could pay for it, apparently on purpose.
La Jefa6.36.5Lemma — Work starts from a schedule, a webhook or a table event with approval steps in the middle, which is the first question procurement asks about automation.
El Hacker8.07.8Juggler — AGPL-3.0, and the extension points are JavaScript I can fork: context items, slash commands, even the loop strategies, with MCP servers and Ollama sitting alongside them.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.