agentboards.org
Compare/Kilo Code vs ACP Client for VS Code

Kilo CodevsACP Client for VS Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Kilo Code
Kilo Code (Anaconda) · IDE extension
#26OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
8 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
7.2
Cost
7.0
Longevity
5.8

“A fork of Roo Code carrying a fork of OpenCode, acquired by Anaconda, so the dependency tree finally has a parent.”

ACP Client for VS Code
Jun Han · IDE extension
#41OSS
Panel
7.3
0 spec wins
Reliability
7.0
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
8.2
Longevity
7.0

“It supports eleven coding agents, one at a time, which is a fair summary of the last two years.”

Spec by spec

SpecKilo CodeACP Client for VS Code
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYesThe extension runs the commands the agent requests and displays their output; the agent loop itself lives in the ACP agent.
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesA Playwright-backed browser tool that navigates, clicks, fills forms, drags and screenshots after each action; it needs a high-capability agentic model to work reliably. No
Sandboxed executionYesCloud Agents run in isolated Linux containers, and the local CLI has an opt-in OS-level sandbox using macOS Seatbelt via sandbox-exec or Linux bubblewrap (not available on Windows). No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNoEleven agents are pre-configured but only one is active at a time, with quick switching between them.
Headless / CI modeYes`kilo run --auto` auto-approves permissions for fully non-interactive CI/CD runs. No
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama, LM StudioGitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, Auggie CLI, Qoder CLI, Codex CLI, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Kiro CLI, Hermes Agent
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars27,467391

Which one would each critic pick

CriticKilo CodeACP Client for VS CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.5ACP Client for VS Code — Pick it if you keep wanting to try the new thing; pick a vendor's own extension if you have already decided and you like their panel.
El Crítico6.07.0ACP Client for VS Code — It serves the agent's file writes against your workspace and runs the commands it asks for under a configurable auto-approve policy.
El Profesor5.57.8ACP Client for VS Code — Every ACP JSON-RPC message can be inspected in a traffic log, which makes a disagreement about whose fault a failure is answerable rather than rhetorical.
La Inversora6.36.8ACP Client for VS Code — The value here is borrowed: it is worth exactly as much as the protocol is adopted, and 372 stars for a free extension is respectable and unmonetisable.
La Jefa6.87.3ACP Client for VS Code — One marketplace identifier in the extension allowlist we already maintain and sixty engineers have it when the editor restarts; that is a memo, not a project.
El Hacker7.37.3no preference

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.