agentboards.org
Compare/Kon vs Qwen Code

KonvsQwen Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Kon
0xku · Terminal agent
#83OSS
Panel
6.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
9.0
Longevity
5.3

“It ships themes, in a tool whose entire argument is that it refuses to waste tokens on anything decorative.”

Qwen Code
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) · Terminal agent
#19OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.3
Longevity
6.3

“Ships a Java SDK, which tells you precisely which enterprises Alibaba expects to pay for it.”

Spec by spec

SpecKonQwen Code
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlYesOptional web_search and web_fetch tools are enabled with --extra-tools; there is no driven browser. YesThe first-party @qwen-code/chrome-bridge extension tunnels cdp_* frames from the `qwen serve` daemon into chrome.debugger so the agent drives a real Chrome tab, but console/network/screenshot/click tools need an external CDP MCP adapter set via QWEN_CDP_MCP_COMMAND, since none is bundled.
Sandboxed executionNoYesTwo real isolation modes - macOS Seatbelt via sandbox-exec (default `permissive-open` profile) and container-based Docker/Podman with a published sandbox image (https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/features/sandbox/).
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeYes"kon -p" runs one prompt non-interactively with tools auto-approved and returns documented exit codes. Yes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Azure AI Foundry, DeepSeek, xAI, ZhipuQwen3-Coder, OpenAI-compatible, Claude, Gemini
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible local endpoint works, with auth checks relaxable through --openai-compat-auth none. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesNo
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars35428,271

Which one would each critic pick

CriticKonQwen CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.0Kon — Pick it if you resume yesterday's work more often than you start something new; pick a heavier agent when you want it to hold more of the project.
El Crítico6.06.3Qwen Code — A daemon mode keeps an agent with a shell resident on your machine and there is no container sandbox in the product, so autonomy and your working tree share a directory.
El Profesor7.86.0Kon — The core prompt is stated at under 270 tokens and the whole fixed harness at about 1,000, which is an accounting almost nobody in this category publishes.
La Inversora6.06.8Qwen Code — Alibaba killed the Qwen OAuth free tier on 2026-04-15, the classic subsidy-to-subscription turn, and 27,000 stars now have to pay someone.
La Jefa5.85.8no preference
El Hacker7.88.8Qwen Code — Apache-2.0, OPENAI_BASE_URL pointed at my own box, modelProviders in settings.json, and MCP servers with a command or an httpUrl; the whole thing is mine to fork.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.