agentboards.org
Compare/Kortix vs Background Agents (Open-Inspect)

KortixvsBackground Agents (Open-Inspect)

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Kortix
Kortix · Autonomous SWE
#156OSSMCP
Panel
6.4
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
6.5

“Suna grew up, changed its name to Kortix, and now files change requests like the rest of us.”

Background Agents (Open-Inspect)
Cole Murray · Autonomous SWE
#126OSS
Panel
6.4
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.7
Longevity
6.0

“It supports multiplayer sessions, so several people can now watch the same agent make the same decision in real time.”

Spec by spec

SpecKortixBackground Agents (Open-Inspect)
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runscloud, sandboxsandbox, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, weblinux, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesYes
Sandboxed executionYesYes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneanyAnthropic Claude, OpenAI Codex, xAI Grok, OpenCode Zen
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$40/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars20,2403,303

Which one would each critic pick

CriticKortixBackground Agents (Open-Inspect)Pick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.36.8Background Agents (Open-Inspect) — Pick Open-Inspect if your backlog is full of well-specified tickets; pick an interactive agent if the work needs a conversation before anyone knows what to build.
El Crítico5.56.0Background Agents (Open-Inspect) — It is documented as designed for single-tenant deployment inside one trusted organisation, and it can also be started by inbound webhooks and third-party alerts.
El Profesor6.57.0Background Agents (Open-Inspect) — Pull requests carry commit attribution back to the person who prompted the run, which preserves provenance through the artefact rather than only in a log.
La Inversora7.06.3Kortix — Twenty thousand stars and a free tier metered at 200 sandbox credits, with enterprise terms behind a conversation, is open-source distribution converted into a compute margin.
La Jefa5.55.3Kortix — Team seats run $40 each, so sixty is $2,400 a month before consumption, and the code sits on vendor machines unless we take on running it ourselves.
El Hacker7.87.3Kortix — Apache-2.0, an MCP client, and a curl install for a thing I can also self-host, which is most of what I ask, minus any local model path.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.