agentboards.org
Compare/Kota vs Pywen

KotavsPywen

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Kota
StepfenShawn · Terminal agent
#252OSS
Panel
4.8
0 spec wins
Reliability
4.3
Usefulness
4.0
Cost
6.8
Longevity
4.0

“Built on the philosophy of vim, which means the configuration is infinite and the exit is somebody else's problem.”

Pywen
PAMPAS Lab · Terminal agent
#261OSS
Panel
4.7
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.3
Usefulness
4.2
Cost
6.7
Longevity
3.5

“Its bundled agent ships a todowrite tool, so it can now record in writing the things it will not be getting to.”

Spec by spec

SpecKotaPywen
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
Backbonemultiple providersQwen, Claude
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars100109

Which one would each critic pick

CriticKotaPywenPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.34.8Kota — Pick it if you enjoy assembling your own tools; pick something with batteries if you want to type a request tonight and get a change back.
El Crítico4.84.3Kota — It edits across files and has no version control operations of its own, so an unwanted change has no undo path the tool can offer you.
El Profesor4.55.0Pywen — Standardised tool interfaces are the correct instrument for comparing agents fairly, and the row publishes no comparison made with it.
La Inversora3.84.5Pywen — A hundred and eight stars, a research lab as the author and no commercial entity, so continuity depends on a grant cycle rather than a runway.
La Jefa4.34.5Pywen — Free across sixty seats, and it is the rare row that names permission control, an approval flow and a trajectory audit as first-class rather than as a roadmap item.
El Hacker6.35.0Kota — MIT, and the configuration is Lua with custom commands of my own, which is the difference between a settings file and a programmable tool.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.