agentboards.org
Compare/Kota vs TunaCode

KotavsTunaCode

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Kota
StepfenShawn · Terminal agent
#252OSS
Panel
4.8
0 spec wins
Reliability
4.3
Usefulness
4.0
Cost
6.8
Longevity
4.0

“Built on the philosophy of vim, which means the configuration is infinite and the exit is somebody else's problem.”

TunaCode
alchemiststudios · Terminal agent
#248OSS
Panel
4.9
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.5
Usefulness
4.3
Cost
6.5
Longevity
4.2

“The interface is inspired by NeXTSTEP, which is either a design philosophy or a very long support commitment.”

Spec by spec

SpecKotaTunaCode
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
Backbonemultiple providersOpenAI-compatible
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars100125

Which one would each critic pick

CriticKotaTunaCodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.35.0Kota — Pick it if you enjoy assembling your own tools; pick something with batteries if you want to type a request tonight and get a change back.
El Crítico4.84.3Kota — It edits across files and has no version control operations of its own, so an unwanted change has no undo path the tool can offer you.
El Profesor4.56.0TunaCode — Files are read with hash-tagged lines and edits are applied against hash-validated references, so a stale target fails loudly instead of landing in the wrong place.
La Inversora3.84.5TunaCode — Around three hundred and seventy weekly installs against 124 stars, from a studio name attached to one person, with nothing charged for anything.
La Jefa4.33.8Kota — The one thing here my team could use is embedding it inside our own service, and there is no console, no single sign-on and nothing that runs unattended.
El Hacker6.35.8Kota — MIT, and the configuration is Lua with custom commands of my own, which is the difference between a settings file and a programmable tool.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.