agentboards.org
Compare/Kun vs Trae

KunvsTrae

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Kun
KunAgent · AI-native IDE
#84MCP
Panel
5.8
0 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
6.5
Longevity
4.8

“It writes your code and also your slide deck, which is the most accurate description of an engineering week ever shipped as a feature list.”

Trae
ByteDance · AI-native IDE
#79MCP
Panel
5.9
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
6.5
Longevity
5.5

“The $3 Lite plan is the cheapest seat on this board, courtesy of a parent company that never needed you to pay for anything.”

Spec by spec

SpecKunTrae
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesBrowser output is attached to tasks and screenshots are captured through browser automation. YesAI can drive TraeCode's built-in browser tab - opening pages, clicking, filling forms and validating rendering - or an external Chrome instance, once enabled under Settings > Browser (https://docs.trae.ai/ide/browser-use). The built-in Chat agent cannot control the browser.
Sandboxed executionNoYesAgent commands run in a restricted, isolated environment with per-project filesystem and network policy in ~/.trae/sandbox.json; Linux isolation is implemented via bubblewrap, and allowlisted command prefixes deliberately bypass the sandbox.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoNoConfirmed false: Trae ships only the desktop IDE; no CLI, print/exec mode or CI runner appears anywhere in the documentation index.
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Ollama, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, Qwen, MiniMaxGemini, GPT, DeepSeek
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesOllama ships as a named provider preset, and base URLs are editable so any OpenAI-compatible or Anthropic-compatible endpoint can be added. YesThe custom-model flow accepts an arbitrary API format, request URL and key, so any self-hosted OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint works alongside the preset providers.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts atn/a$3/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
LicensePolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0proprietary
GitHub stars6,324n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticKunTraePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.36.8Trae — Try Trae if you are price sensitive and building personal projects; think twice if your employer will ask where the prompts go, because the vendor is ByteDance.
El Crítico5.85.8no preference
El Profesor6.55.5Kun — The graphical client and the terminal client both attach to one local runtime, so threads, plans and approvals are shared state rather than two synchronised copies.
La Inversora5.05.8Trae — A $3 Lite tier from ByteDance is subsidized distribution, not a business, and the buyer's risk is geopolitical rather than financial.
La Jefa4.85.5Trae — Enterprise means contacting BytePlus, the pricing page lists no SSO or audit log, and the security questionnaire's first question is where the prompts go; not yet.
El Hacker6.56.0Kun — PolyForm Noncommercial, so I can read it and never ship a competing fork, but Ollama is a named preset and every base URL is editable.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.