agentboards.org
Compare/Langflow vs n8n

Langflowvsn8n

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Langflow
Langflow · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
7.5
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
8.5
Longevity
8.0

“Shipping since February 2023, which in agent-framework years qualifies it for a pension and a plaque.”

n8n
n8n GmbH · Agent framework
MCP
Panel
7.4
2 spec wins
Reliability
7.0
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
7.2
Longevity
8.0

“A 2019 workflow tool that discovered agents, which is still earlier than most agent companies discovered revenue.”

Spec by spec

SpecLangflown8n
Architecture
CategoryAgent frameworkAgent framework
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoNo
Multi-file editsNoNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
Backboneanyany
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelfreemixed
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesNo
LicenseMITSustainable Use License and n8n Enterprise License (fair-code)
GitHub stars155,446206,477

Which one would each critic pick

CriticLangflown8nPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.57.8n8n — Pick n8n when the agent is one step in an automation that also has to touch a database and a Slack channel; pick Langflow when the agent itself is the whole project.
El Crítico6.86.8no preference
El Profesor7.57.3Langflow — The visual layer sits over a Python runtime, so the graph is executed rather than transpiled, and the same graph can be exposed as tools to external clients over MCP.
La Inversora7.58.5n8n — Two hundred thousand stars and six years of shipping since 2019 buy distribution nothing in this category can match, with enterprise terms negotiated privately.
La Jefa6.87.3n8n — Cloud tiers run EUR 20, 50 and 667 a month rather than per seat, so sixty people cost the same as six, and the annual commitment is the only friction.
El Hacker8.87.0Langflow — MIT, one docker run to have it on localhost, local model endpoints supported, and it acts as both an MCP client and an MCP server, which almost nothing else does.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.