agentboards.org
Compare/Lemon vs nac

Lemonvsnac

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Lemon
z80dev · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.1
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
7.2
Longevity
5.3

“You can keep several specialist agents with separate memories and workspaces, which is one more org chart than most companies actually need.”

nac
Arcee AI · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.1
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
5.7
Cost
6.8
Longevity
6.0

“The README credits three separate projects as influences, which is more citation discipline than most conference papers manage.”

Spec by spec

SpecLemonnac
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneAnthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, Bedrock, Azure, 27 providersArcee, OpenAI Codex, OpenAI-compatible
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesThe README says compatible local endpoints can be configured separately from the 27 hosted providers. No
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars130278

Which one would each critic pick

CriticLemonnacPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.3Lemon — Pick it if you want an assistant you message from your phone the way you message a colleague; pick a terminal agent if the work never leaves the repository.
El Crítico5.55.5no preference
El Profesor6.06.8nac — Only structured episodes return to the planner, so context growth is bounded by the summary format rather than by the length of the work.
La Inversora5.36.0nac — A model company giving away a harness that logs you in with its own account is distribution spending, and 209 stars is what it has bought so far.
La Jefa5.05.3nac — It is aimed at exactly the long infrastructure work I would want governed, and it installs by piping a remote script into a shell on every machine.
El Hacker8.06.8Lemon — MIT, twenty-seven providers plus my own local endpoints, and it speaks the tool protocol in both directions, so it consumes my servers and becomes one.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.