agentboards.org
Compare/Magi vs Zenith

MagivsZenith

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Magi
MistRipple · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.9
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
6.0
Cost
6.3
Longevity
5.3

“Its tool list includes image generation, because the thing your failing test suite needed was an illustration.”

Zenith
Intelligent Internet · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.9
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.5

“The research finding is that long agent runs fail by stopping too early, which makes them the most relatable thing in the stack.”

Spec by spec

SpecMagiZenith
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesRole agents for execution, exploration, architecture, testing and review run in parallel under a mainline agent, each with its own model. YesThe orchestrator dynamically allocates worker and tester sessions and can register reusable skills between turns.
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropicvia managed agents (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes)
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars216320

Which one would each critic pick

CriticMagiZenithPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.86.3Zenith — Pick it for work that takes days rather than minutes; pick a plain terminal agent when the task is small enough that stopping early is not the failure you fear.
El Crítico5.05.8Zenith — The orchestrator decides each turn whether to spawn more workers and testers, so the depth of a run is set by the same component that judges whether the work is finished.
El Profesor7.06.0Magi — One run trace records the goal, the derived tasks, every tool call, the resulting changes and the verification results, which makes a completed run auditable end to end.
La Inversora5.55.3Magi — 215 stars, a permissive licence, no company, and an install path that begins with building the desktop package from source. Nothing here is trying to be sold yet.
La Jefa5.04.8Magi — Free at sixty desks and governed nowhere: the permission layer it advertises is local to each installation, with its whole state living in a directory under each home folder.
El Hacker7.37.5Zenith — Apache-2.0, launched with uv run, and it orchestrates over MCP and ACP, so the sessions it drives are the agents I already installed rather than a captive runtime.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.