agentboards.org
Compare/minion vs Warp

minionvsWarp

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

minion
Sentdex · Terminal agent
#50OSS
Panel
6.5
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.7
Longevity
4.8

“It renders the model's separate reasoning stream as a thinking block, so you can watch it talk itself into the bug.”

Warp
Warp · Terminal agent
#20OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
7 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
5.5
Longevity
7.2

“Scored 75.8 on SWE-bench Verified with a best-of-k wrapper, which is also how most of us get through code review.”

Spec by spec

SpecminionWarp
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoYesComputer Use environments bundle Chromium plus the Playwright CLI and can attach over CDP, so the agent navigates, clicks, fills forms and reads pages.
Sandboxed executionNoYesCloud runs execute in a containerized sandbox built from a Docker image with no access to the local machine; local interactive sessions are not sandboxed.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
Backboneany OpenAI-compatible endpoint, llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang, OpenAI, Z.aiGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, open-weight models via Fireworks
Bring your own modelYesYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, an internal gateway) plus BYO Anthropic, OpenAI or Google keys and custom routers.
Local modelsYesMINION_BASE_URL points at any OpenAI-compatible server; local llama.cpp, vLLM and SGLang are the primary target. YesOllama, LM Studio, vLLM and llama.cpp are supported through the custom inference endpoint, but only when exposed at a public URL via a tunnel, since localhost and private addresses are rejected.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
GitHub stars33765,338

Which one would each critic pick

CriticminionWarpPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.87.3Warp — Use Warp if you want an agent in the terminal you already open every morning, with a standalone CLI and cloud agents when you outgrow it, and read the credit table before you pick a plan.
El Crítico5.86.0Warp — The container sandbox exists only in Warp's cloud while the terminal agent works beside your files, and bring-your-own-key is gated to a $50-a-seat Business plan, so the safe configuration is the expensive one.
El Profesor7.36.0minion — The 625-token figure is measured precisely: a bare greeting, a system prompt, five tool schemas and the chat-template framing, which is a definition most claims of this kind lack.
La Inversora5.86.8Warp — Warp spent years building a terminal, open-sourced it under AGPL, and is now selling credits and $200 Max plans on top of it; the terminal is the distribution, the agent is the business.
La Jefa5.36.0Warp — SAML SSO and bring-your-own-key arrive at Business, $50 a seat with a 25-seat cap, so sixty engineers means Enterprise and a custom quote; approved with conditions.
El Hacker8.06.8minion — MIT, MINION_BASE_URL points at llama.cpp, vLLM or SGLang, and when a server has no native tool calling it falls back to parsing the text, which is the detail that gives it away.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.