NetclodevsSupacode
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Netclode
angristan · Agent harness
Panel
5.73 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.7
- Cost
- 6.3
- Longevity
- 3.8
“The workspace lives in object storage, so a paused session costs only storage, making this the rare agent that gets cheaper when ignored.”
Supacode
Supabit · Agent harness
Panel
5.33 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.7
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 5.5
- Longevity
- 3.5
“The sidebar nests rows by branch and hoists the worktrees that need you, which is triage with considerably better typography.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Netclode | Supacode |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | cloud, sandbox | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, web | macos |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | No |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | YesFiles are changed by the Claude Code, OpenCode, Copilot or Codex SDK running inside the microVM. | YesFiles are changed by the coding agent running in each pane; Supacode supplies the worktree, terminal and review surface. |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | Yes | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | YesA GitHub bot spins up a sandbox on an @mention in an issue or pull request and auto-reviews Dependabot and Renovate updates. | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Claude Code SDK, OpenCode, Copilot, Codex SDK, Anthropic, OpenAI, Mistral, Ollama | Claude, Codex, Copilot |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | YesOllama is listed as an optional provider for running models on your own GPU. | No |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | n/a |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | unspecified | unknown |
| GitHub stars | 257 | 2,391 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Netclode | Supacode | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.0 | 6.0 | no preference |
| El Crítico | 5.3 | 5.5 | Supacode — It knows what each agent is doing by installing hooks into that agent's own configuration, which makes the status display dependent on three other vendors not changing their hook format. |
| El Profesor | 6.5 | 6.8 | Supacode — Sessions run inside a separate session daemon rather than as children of the application, so the interface is a viewer over state that outlives it. |
| La Inversora | 5.0 | 4.8 | Netclode — 252 stars, one author, nothing hosted and nothing for sale: the price is zero and the cost is a platform engineer's calendar. |
| La Jefa | 5.3 | 4.0 | Netclode — Per-repository scoped tokens from a forge app, and a proxy that keeps provider keys out of the sandbox: two controls I usually have to ask for. |
| El Hacker | 6.0 | 4.8 | Netclode — The repository publishes source with no LICENSE file, so there is no grant at all; Ollama is optional, and everything else here is mine to run. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.