no_humanvsOpenHands
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
no_human
no_human · Autonomous SWE
#95OSSMCP
Panel
6.22 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.7
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 6.8
- Longevity
- 5.8
“It runs an AI coding factory on your own machine, which is a stately way to describe the noise your laptop fan now makes.”
OpenHands
OpenHands (All Hands AI) · Autonomous SWE
#8OSSMCP
Panel
7.06 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.2
- Usefulness
- 7.3
- Cost
- 6.7
- Longevity
- 7.0
“Scores 71.8% on SWE-bench Verified and still needs you to install Docker first.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | no_human | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Autonomous SWE | Autonomous SWE |
| Runs | local | local, cloud, sandbox |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows, web |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes |
| Browser control | No | YesA first-party browser tool driven through the SDK's browser-use guide, with session recording (https://docs.openhands.dev/sdk/guides/agent-browser-use). |
| Sandboxed execution | No | YesDocker is the default sandbox runtime, with Apptainer, remote and API sandboxes as alternatives (https://docs.openhands.dev/openhands/usage/sandboxes/overview). |
| Multi-agent orchestration | YesEach task runs a coder and then a separate adversarial reviewer model that never saw the coder's session, and several tasks run at once. | No |
| Headless / CI mode | No | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | any | Claude, GPT, Gemini, Qwen, Kimi, any OpenAI-compatible model |
| Bring your own model | Yes | YesAny LiteLLM-supported provider, plus AWS Bedrock, Azure, Google and enterprise LLM gateways, are configurable per profile (https://docs.openhands.dev/openhands/usage/llms/litellm-proxy). |
| Local models | No | YesDocumented end to end for LM Studio and Ollama, and any OpenAI-compatible base URL can be set in advanced LLM settings. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | mixed |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 89,764 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | no_human | OpenHands | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.5 | 7.3 | OpenHands — The open autonomous agent to run when you want a sandbox and a pull request instead of a chat; expect setup and a token bill on real repos. |
| El Crítico | 5.5 | 7.0 | OpenHands — The sandbox is real and the leaderboard entry is public, which makes the bill the failure mode: autonomy reads until it stops, and you pay for the reading. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 7.5 | OpenHands — A sandboxed agent with a public, maintainer-checked SWE-bench Verified entry; the number is comparable, which is rarer than the number being high. |
| La Inversora | 6.0 | 5.8 | no_human — A marketing domain in front of a free tool that runs entirely on the user's hardware: it costs the maker nothing to operate and captures nothing either. |
| La Jefa | 5.3 | 5.8 | OpenHands — Self-hosted in our VPC with SAML on the Enterprise tier is the right shape; the price is custom and the free tiers do not fit sixty seats. |
| El Hacker | 7.3 | 9.0 | OpenHands — MIT, Docker sandbox, any OpenAI-compatible model including local, MCP in a TOML file, a Python SDK; I can run the whole thing on my own iron. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.