agentboards.org
Compare/Omnigent vs Ruflo

OmnigentvsRuflo

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Omnigent
Omnigent AI · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.2
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.5
Usefulness
5.2
Cost
6.7
Longevity
4.5

“Syncs the session to terminal, browser, phone and desktop, so you can watch an agent wait for approval from anywhere.”

Ruflo
rUv · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
5.3
3 spec wins
Reliability
4.7
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
5.2
Longevity
5.8

“Renamed from Claude Flow to Ruflo, which the author says stands for Rust, flow states and inevitability; one of those is a language.”

Spec by spec

SpecOmnigentRuflo
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionYesNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneAnthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Ollama, Azure, LiteLLM, vLLMClaude, OpenAI, Gemini, Cohere, Ollama, OpenRouter
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars10,41273,677

Which one would each critic pick

CriticOmnigentRufloPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.36.0Ruflo — Pick Ruflo if you already live in Claude Code and want a hundred specialised agents behind one MCP command; pick oh-my-claudecode if you want a pipeline you can explain.
El Crítico5.04.8Omnigent — Windows gets no native terminal wrappers and no filesystem sandbox, the docs say so, and everything else is alpha.
El Profesor5.34.8Omnigent — An agent is a YAML document naming a prompt, an executor harness and tools; sessions can be shared, co-driven or forked; no benchmark is published for an alpha.
La Inversora4.04.8Ruflo — One author, MIT, 70,000 stars, two hosted UIs at flo.ruv.io and goal.ruv.io with no price on either; a talent asset, not a company.
La Jefa4.84.0Omnigent — Spend caps with soft warnings and shell-command approval are the right controls, and they arrive in an alpha with Python 3.12 and Node 22 prerequisites and no SSO; not yet.
El Hacker7.07.3Ruflo — MIT, 27 hooks, Ollama and OpenRouter in the router, an MCP server I start with one npx command, and enough source to lose a month in.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.