agentboards.org
Compare/OpenChamber vs Tessera

OpenChambervsTessera

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

OpenChamber
OpenChamber · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.3
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
6.0
Longevity
6.5

“Prompts can be scheduled daily, weekly or on a cron, so the agent can now disappoint you on a timetable.”

Tessera
Horang Labs · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.3
0 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
6.8
Longevity
5.8

“A paired phone continues the same sessions, so the agent can now wait for your approval while you are asleep.”

Spec by spec

SpecOpenChamberTessera
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesCommand execution happens in the OpenCode agent OpenChamber launches; OpenChamber lets you reattach to a running terminal from any paired device. Yes
Multi-file editsYesYesFiles are changed by the Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode session Tessera runs in each worktree; Tessera adds its own file and diff editor on top.
Git operationsYesMulti-run can put each parallel session in its own git worktree, and GitHub sessions can update or merge a pull request from inside OpenChamber. Yes
Browser controlYesPreview opens the running app beside the conversation, and the desktop build has a built-in browser that can send an element's screenshot, styles and console errors to the agent. No
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesMulti-run gives one task to up to five models at once and Fusion merges the best parts of their results. YesA lead agent can create worktrees and launch, read and prompt parallel worker sessions through the /tessera-cli command.
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneOpenCodeClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
GitHub stars11,015311

Which one would each critic pick

CriticOpenChamberTesseraPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.36.8Tessera — Pick Tessera if you want agent work to move through visible stages; pick a single session if a board with five columns would only be a board you stopped updating.
El Crítico5.55.3OpenChamber — Pointing at an element sends the running page's screenshot, styles and console errors to the agent, so whatever that page contains becomes agent input.
El Profesor6.86.5OpenChamber — A goal is checked after every turn and the loop continues until it is met, blocked, or a limit is reached, which is a stated termination condition.
La Inversora6.55.8OpenChamber — 9,556 stars and over twenty-three thousand editor installations from a repository that did not exist before September 2025, with nothing charged for any of it.
La Jefa6.05.8OpenChamber — Self-hosted with an encrypted relay paired by scanning a code, which answers where the data goes and opens the question of whose phone is holding it.
El Hacker6.87.5Tessera — Strong copyleft, which is the licence I want on something I depend on, and each backend takes a custom model identifier so I decide what is actually behind each session.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.