OpenCodevsWarp
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
OpenCode
Anomaly (formerly SST) · Terminal agent
#5OSSMCP
Panel
7.02 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.7
- Usefulness
- 7.3
- Cost
- 7.3
- Longevity
- 6.8
“Two hundred thousand GitHub stars, seventy-five providers, and a vendor that renamed itself before the tool did.”
Warp
Warp · Terminal agent
#20OSSMCP
Panel
6.52 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.5
- Usefulness
- 6.7
- Cost
- 5.5
- Longevity
- 7.2
“Scored 75.8 on SWE-bench Verified with a best-of-k wrapper, which is also how most of us get through code review.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | OpenCode | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Terminal agent | Terminal agent |
| Runs | local | local, cloud |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes |
| Browser control | NoBuilt-in tools include webfetch and websearch only; nothing drives or reads a browser. | YesComputer Use environments bundle Chromium plus the Playwright CLI and can attach over CDP, so the agent navigates, clicks, fills forms and reads pages. |
| Sandboxed execution | NoTool calls are gated by the permission config, which is an approval policy rather than container or OS-level isolation. | YesCloud runs execute in a containerized sandbox built from a Docker image with no access to the local machine; local interactive sessions are not sandboxed. |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | Yes | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, Ollama | GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, open-weight models via Fireworks |
| Bring your own model | Yes | YesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, an internal gateway) plus BYO Anthropic, OpenAI or Google keys and custom routers. |
| Local models | Yes | YesOllama, LM Studio, vLLM and llama.cpp are supported through the custom inference endpoint, but only when exposed at a public URL via a tunnel, since localhost and private addresses are rejected. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | mixed | mixed |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| GitHub stars | 211,366 | 65,338 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | OpenCode | Warp | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 8.0 | 7.3 | OpenCode — OpenCode is what to hand anyone who wants the Claude Code shape with their own keys and a model picker; pick Claude Code if you want one vendor and one bill. |
| El Crítico | 7.0 | 6.0 | OpenCode — Commands run with your permissions and no sandbox, and the Zen gateway offers free models without saying who pays for them. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 6.0 | OpenCode — The provider abstraction over 75+ backends is the design most likely to survive model turnover, and no benchmark of any kind is published. |
| La Inversora | 6.0 | 6.8 | Warp — Warp spent years building a terminal, open-sourced it under AGPL, and is now selling credits and $200 Max plans on top of it; the terminal is the distribution, the agent is the business. |
| La Jefa | 5.8 | 6.0 | Warp — SAML SSO and bring-your-own-key arrive at Business, $50 a seat with a 25-seat cap, so sixty engineers means Enterprise and a custom quote; approved with conditions. |
| El Hacker | 8.8 | 6.8 | OpenCode — MIT, Ollama for offline, MCP servers in opencode.json with a published $schema, custom agents, and it has already been forked, which is the point. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.