agentboards.org
Compare/OpenDev vs zot

OpenDevvszot

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

OpenDev
OpenDev · Terminal agent
#97OSSMCP
Panel
6.6
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
8.2
Longevity
5.8

“It publishes a technical report on arXiv, which is an unusual amount of paperwork for something you install with a package manager.”

zot
Patrice Eckhart · Terminal agent
#110OSS
Panel
6.6
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.7
Longevity
5.7

“It can run as a Telegram bot, so your coding agent now lives in the same app as your family group chat.”

Spec by spec

SpecOpenDevzot
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNoThe built-in /jail sandbox is a path and shell guardrail, not container isolation; the README suggests running zot under Docker if you need real isolation.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesParallel agents are the headline feature, each one bound to the LLM you pick for it. YesSwarm subagents share the host working directory and the same read, write, edit and bash tools; there is no per-agent worktree or branch.
Headless / CI modeNoYesPrint, stream and JSON modes accept piped stdin, and a headless Telegram daemon is supported.
Models
BackboneAnthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Mistral, Qwen, OpenRouter, Ollama, LM StudioAnthropic, OpenAI, Codex, Google Gemini, Vertex AI, GitHub Copilot, Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, OpenRouter, Groq, Cerebras, xAI, Together, Hugging Face, Mistral, Moonshot, Kimi, DeepSeek, Z.AI, Xiaomi, MiniMax, Fireworks, Vercel AI Gateway, Cloudflare AI, Ollama
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYesOllama and local models are a built-in provider.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars843348

Which one would each critic pick

CriticOpenDevzotPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.0no preference
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor6.56.3OpenDev — Binding each parallel worker to a distinct model is an ensemble design, and the accompanying technical report is the only methodology statement on this row.
La Inversora6.56.0OpenDev — 832 stars, no company, no price and no hosted surface: a well-executed tool occupying a position that generates goodwill and nothing else.
La Jefa5.36.3zot — The print and JSON modes accept piped input and emit structured output, so it can sit in a pipeline, and Windows is supported where most of this category is not.
El Hacker8.07.8OpenDev — MIT, `cargo install`, MCP servers attach, and Ollama or LM Studio are in the provider list, so a worker can run on weights I serve myself.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.