agentboards.org
Compare/Paperclip vs Strix

PaperclipvsStrix

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Paperclip
Paperclip Labs, Inc. · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.7
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
7.0
Longevity
7.0

“Gives every agent a title and a reporting line, so the first thing your AI workforce receives is middle management.”

Strix
Strix · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.9
7 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
6.5
Longevity
7.2

“A security tool whose install instructions begin with curl piped to bash, which is either irony or the first test.”

Spec by spec

SpecPaperclipStrix
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, webmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsNoNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionNoYes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
Backbonevia agent adapters (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, OpenClaw, Hermes, Pi, HTTP and shell agents)GLM, GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelNoYes
Local modelsNoYes
Cost
Pricing modelfreemixed
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyNoYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars95,91665,976

Which one would each critic pick

CriticPaperclipStrixPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.0no preference
El Crítico6.06.3Strix — It sells working proofs of concept, not false positives, without publishing a false-positive rate, and it attacks from a README that reminds you unauthorised testing is illegal.
El Profesor6.56.8Strix — A graph of specialised agents for reconnaissance, exploitation and post-exploitation that share discoveries in parallel; verification is execution, since a finding counts only when the exploit runs.
La Inversora6.37.5Strix — SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and a logo wall with AWS, PayPal, Uber, Ford and Pfizer: a security company that sells the way security companies sell, references first.
La Jefa6.36.3no preference
El Hacker8.37.5Paperclip — MIT, self-hosted in Docker, an adapter contract so loose that a shell script or a webhook counts as an employee, and an MCP gateway ticked on the roadmap.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.