agentboards.org
Compare/pi vs Warp

pivsWarp

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

pi
Earendil Inc. · Terminal agent
#9OSS
Panel
6.8
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.3
Longevity
7.0

“A coding agent that ships themes, which is the first time anyone has cared what the terminal looks like while a file gets deleted.”

Warp
Warp · Terminal agent
#20OSSMCP
Panel
6.5
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
5.5
Longevity
7.2

“Scored 75.8 on SWE-bench Verified with a best-of-k wrapper, which is also how most of us get through code review.”

Spec by spec

SpecpiWarp
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoYesComputer Use environments bundle Chromium plus the Playwright CLI and can attach over CDP, so the agent navigates, clicks, fills forms and reads pages.
Sandboxed executionNoYesCloud runs execute in a containerized sandbox built from a Docker image with no access to the local machine; local interactive sessions are not sandboxed.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenRouter, llama.cppGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, open-weight models via Fireworks
Bring your own modelYesYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, an internal gateway) plus BYO Anthropic, OpenAI or Google keys and custom routers.
Local modelsYesYesOllama, LM Studio, vLLM and llama.cpp are supported through the custom inference endpoint, but only when exposed at a public URL via a tunnel, since localhost and private addresses are rejected.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
GitHub stars111,33965,338

Which one would each critic pick

CriticpiWarpPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.57.3pi — Pick pi if you want a terminal agent small enough to read in an afternoon and extend in TypeScript; pick OpenCode if your workflow already depends on MCP servers.
El Crítico6.86.0pi — Extensions are TypeScript modules loaded into the agent's own process, so a package is a supply chain, and the install line already says --ignore-scripts.
El Profesor7.36.0pi — A unified LLM API, an agent loop, a TUI and a CLI in one monorepo; sessions branch into a tree with compaction that summarises abandoned branches; no benchmark is published.
La Inversora5.56.8Warp — Warp spent years building a terminal, open-sourced it under AGPL, and is now selling credits and $200 Max plans on top of it; the terminal is the distribution, the agent is the business.
La Jefa5.56.0Warp — SAML SSO and bring-your-own-key arrive at Business, $50 a seat with a 25-seat cap, so sixty engineers means Enterprise and a custom quote; approved with conditions.
El Hacker8.56.8pi — MIT TypeScript, extensions that add tools, commands and UI, /llama for llama.cpp on my box, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in the environment, and packages to share it all.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.