agentboards.org
Compare/Qoder vs Trae

QodervsTrae

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Qoder
Alibaba · AI-native IDE
#36MCP
Panel
6.5
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.0
Longevity
7.0

“There is a mobile app for approving agent work, so you can now merge a refactor you cannot read on a screen you cannot see.”

Trae
ByteDance · AI-native IDE
#79MCP
Panel
5.9
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
6.5
Longevity
5.5

“The $3 Lite plan is the cheapest seat on this board, courtesy of a parent company that never needed you to pay for anything.”

Spec by spec

SpecQoderTrae
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoYesAI can drive TraeCode's built-in browser tab - opening pages, clicking, filling forms and validating rendering - or an external Chrome instance, once enabled under Settings > Browser (https://docs.trae.ai/ide/browser-use). The built-in Chat agent cannot control the browser.
Sandboxed executionNoYesAgent commands run in a restricted, isolated environment with per-project filesystem and network policy in ~/.trae/sandbox.json; Linux isolation is implemented via bubblewrap, and allowlisted command prefixes deliberately bypass the sandbox.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesExperts mode dispatches multiple expert agents in parallel, and subagents can be supplied by installed extensions. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoNoConfirmed false: Trae ships only the desktop IDE; no CLI, print/exec mode or CI runner appears anywhere in the documentation index.
Models
BackboneQwen, GLM, KimiGemini, GPT, DeepSeek
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoYesThe custom-model flow accepts an arbitrary API format, request URL and key, so any self-hosted OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint works alongside the preset providers.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$3/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesBring Your Own Key is listed as a Free plan feature. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticQoderTraePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.8no preference
El Crítico6.35.8Qoder — Quest mode takes long-running multi-step delegation across your working tree, and this row records no container isolation, so a bad plan runs for a long time in your checkout.
El Profesor6.85.5Qoder — Repo Wiki precomputes a structured description of the repository and serves it as context, which is a materialised index rather than retrieval at query time.
La Inversora7.85.8Qoder — The Chinese edition is the renamed Tongyi Lingma with 2.6 million marketplace installs, so this launched with distribution most vendors here spend three years buying.
La Jefa6.35.5Qoder — Sixty developers is $1,200 monthly at the entry tier and $12,000 at the top, everything is metered in Credits, and team pricing is quoted rather than published.
El Hacker5.56.0Trae — Closed source, but any compatible endpoint with my own key, local models, an mcpServers config and subagents; more knobs than I expected from a ByteDance IDE.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.