agentboards.org
Compare/Qwen Code vs Zero

Qwen CodevsZero

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Qwen Code
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) · Terminal agent
#19OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.5
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.3
Longevity
6.3

“Ships a Java SDK, which tells you precisely which enterprises Alibaba expects to pay for it.”

Zero
Gitlawb · Terminal agent
#6OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
8.2
Longevity
6.2

“It accepts image input in a terminal, a sentence that would have ended a career in 2019.”

Spec by spec

SpecQwen CodeZero
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe first-party @qwen-code/chrome-bridge extension tunnels cdp_* frames from the `qwen serve` daemon into chrome.debugger so the agent drives a real Chrome tab, but console/network/screenshot/click tools need an external CDP MCP adapter set via QWEN_CDP_MCP_COMMAND, since none is bundled. YesBrowser and terminal control helpers ship with the npm and release builds; source builds need those helper binaries on PATH or configured in local-control settings.
Sandboxed executionYesTwo real isolation modes - macOS Seatbelt via sandbox-exec (default `permissive-open` profile) and container-based Docker/Podman with a published sandbox image (https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/features/sandbox/). NoZero ships a native Linux sandbox helper using seccomp rather than Docker; source builds must build the `zero-linux-sandbox` helper separately.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes`zero exec` returns exit codes and has a documented GitHub Action recipe.
Models
BackboneQwen3-Coder, OpenAI-compatible, Claude, GeminiOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Groq, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Mistral, xAI, Qwen, Kimi, GitHub Models, Fireworks, MiniMax, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts atn/a$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars28,2711,688

Which one would each critic pick

CriticQwen CodeZeroPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.3Zero — Pick it if you want a terminal agent that lets you change your mind mid-task; pick Crush if you want the same shape with a longer track record behind it.
El Crítico6.36.8Zero — Package builds ship the browser and terminal control helpers; a source build needs those binaries on PATH and expects you to build the Linux sandbox helper separately.
El Profesor6.07.3Zero — Sessions can be resumed or forked, which makes a continuation a controlled variable, and the headless mode emits text, JSON or stream-JSON rather than prose only.
La Inversora6.85.5Qwen Code — Alibaba killed the Qwen OAuth free tier on 2026-04-15, the classic subsidy-to-subscription turn, and 27,000 stars now have to pay someone.
La Jefa5.86.8Zero — Nothing to license for sixty, and it is the rare tool that returns meaningful exit codes with a documented continuous integration recipe, so it can gate a build.
El Hacker8.88.5Qwen Code — Apache-2.0, OPENAI_BASE_URL pointed at my own box, modelProviders in settings.json, and MCP servers with a command or an httpUrl; the whole thing is mine to fork.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.