agentboards.org
Compare/Supermaven vs Zhanlu

SupermavenvsZhanlu

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Supermaven
Supermaven (Cursor / Anysphere) · IDE extension
#273
Panel
2.7
1 spec wins
Reliability
3.5
Usefulness
2.8
Cost
3.2
Longevity
1.3

“Built by the inventor of Tabnine, bought by Cursor, and now a changelog entry for Cursor Tab.”

Zhanlu
China Mobile Cloud · IDE extension
#265MCP
Panel
3.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
3.3
Usefulness
4.3
Cost
2.8
Longevity
3.5

“One of its modes generates practice problems, so it can now set the homework and then do it for you.”

Spec by spec

SpecSupermavenZhanlu
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context window1M tokensnot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoYesDocumented only for AI Programmer mode, which the vendor says saves and executes the code it writes and then debugs it.
Multi-file editsNoYesAI Programmer mode supports file editing and project-level code generation across files; the other modes work on the selected snippet.
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneSupermaven, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 SonnetZhanlu code model
Bring your own modelNoNo
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionmixed
Starts at$10/mon/a
Free tierYesNo
Bring your own keyNoNo
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars1,458n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticSupermavenZhanluPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo3.34.0Zhanlu — Pick it only if you already work inside this cloud; for everyone else the account requirement decides the question before any feature does.
El Crítico2.83.5Zhanlu — The extension is built on two open-source codebases, which the vendor credits, and shipped closed, so upstream fixes and local divergence are both unobservable.
El Profesor4.03.3Supermaven — The 1M-token completion context was the design claim and it was never measured publicly; the chat panel used GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, so the proprietary model only covered autocomplete.
La Inversora2.34.8Zhanlu — Thirty-six thousand editor installations since June 2024, given away by a telecommunications cloud that charges for the account you need to use it.
La Jefa1.82.8Zhanlu — No price is published, use requires a registration on a portal that is not reachable from here, and there is no console, single sign-on or audit export.
El Hacker2.32.8Zhanlu — Closed source, one vendor model, no key of my own and no local weights, so the only thing I can configure is which tool servers it may call.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.