agentboards.org
Compare/Vicoa vs harness

Vicoavsharness

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Vicoa
Vicoa AI · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
5.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
4.8
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
6.0
Longevity
4.8

“This multi-agent orchestrator runs your agents in parallel git worktrees, but without a sandbox, they execute directly on your local machine”

harness
wedow · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
5.6
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.0
Usefulness
5.5
Cost
7.3
Longevity
4.7

“It can sign in with your ChatGPT or Claude subscription, which is a large decision for a hundred lines of shell script to be making.”

Spec by spec

SpecVicoaharness
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, windows, linux, webmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneAnthropic, OpenAI, Groq, ChatGPT subscription, Claude subscription
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts atn/a$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseAGPL-3.0-onlyMIT
GitHub stars453169

Which one would each critic pick

CriticVicoaharnessPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.56.0Vicoa — Vicoa is for developers who want to run multiple agents in parallel on the same codebase and steer them from anywhere.
El Crítico6.04.5Vicoa — Vicoa orchestrates agents but lacks a sandbox, making it a powerful but risky command center for experienced users.
El Profesor5.36.3harness — The core handles only discovery, hook dispatch and the loop; providers, serialisation and prompt loading are all plugins, which makes the boundary between mechanism and policy explicit.
La Inversora6.05.5Vicoa — Vicoa is a useful orchestrator for developers managing multiple agents, but its BYOK model and lack of a clear revenue stream make it a likely acquisition target.
La Jefa3.54.3harness — Free across sixty engineers and it runs unattended, but the approval gates and the cost tracking are both plugins, which means both are optional.
El Hacker6.07.3harness — MIT, Homebrew or the AUR, and the entire dependency list is bash, jq and curl, with plugins in whatever language I feel like writing them in.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.