ACP Client for VS CodevsZoo Code
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
ACP Client for VS Code
Jun Han · IDE extension
#41OSS
Panel
7.30 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.0
- Usefulness
- 6.8
- Cost
- 8.2
- Longevity
- 7.0
“It supports eleven coding agents, one at a time, which is a fair summary of the last two years.”
Zoo Code
Zoo Code Org · IDE extension
#16OSSMCP
Panel
7.54 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.0
- Usefulness
- 7.5
- Cost
- 8.5
- Longevity
- 7.2
“The original team wound down the extension to focus on Roomote, so the fork is now the product and the product is now a memory.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | ACP Client for VS Code | Zoo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | IDE extension | IDE extension |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | YesThe extension runs the commands the agent requests and displays their output; the agent loop itself lives in the ACP agent. | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | No | No |
| Browser control | No | NoThe documented tool set covers read, edit, execute, image and workflow tools; no browser tool is listed. |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | NoEleven agents are pre-configured but only one is active at a time, with quick switching between them. | YesThe Orchestrator delegates subtasks with parallel coordination, per-subtask provider profiles and parent/child task recovery. |
| Headless / CI mode | No | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, Auggie CLI, Qoder CLI, Codex CLI, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Kiro CLI, Hermes Agent | Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, Grok, MiniMax, Zoo Gateway, Ollama, LM Studio |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | 391 | 1,937 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | ACP Client for VS Code | Zoo Code | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 7.5 | 7.8 | Zoo Code — Pick Zoo Code if you already know Roo Code's modes and want a version somebody is still maintaining; pick Cline if you would rather start from the tool with the largest crowd. |
| El Crítico | 7.0 | 7.0 | no preference |
| El Profesor | 7.8 | 7.0 | ACP Client for VS Code — Every ACP JSON-RPC message can be inspected in a traffic log, which makes a disagreement about whose fault a failure is answerable rather than rhetorical. |
| La Inversora | 6.8 | 7.5 | Zoo Code — 1,793 stars in four months and a gateway selling pay-as-you-go credits with no subscription. That is a fork with a revenue line, which is rarer than the fork. |
| La Jefa | 7.3 | 7.5 | Zoo Code — Zero across sixty seats, and multi-root path controls plus per-mode server restrictions give me something to actually configure, which almost nothing free on this board does. |
| El Hacker | 7.3 | 8.5 | Zoo Code — Apache-2.0, my own keys at the provider's own rates, and Ollama and LM Studio are documented providers, so the whole loop runs on hardware I built if I want it to. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.