agentboards.org
Compare/aiXcoder vs Cody

aiXcodervsCody

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

aiXcoder
aiXcoder · IDE extension
#171MCP
Panel
5.3
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.0
Usefulness
5.7
Cost
5.0
Longevity
5.5

“The suite includes something called Math2Code, which is either a compiler or a threat.”

Cody
Sourcegraph · IDE extension
#175MCP
Panel
4.8
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
4.5
Cost
4.0
Longevity
5.0

“Free and Pro ended in July 2025, so the cheapest way to try Cody is now a $16K annual contract.”

Spec by spec

SpecaiXcoderCody
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesThe suite is built on a multi-agent architecture spanning requirement understanding, task decomposition, code generation, test verification and delivery. No
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneaiXcoderClaude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek
Bring your own modelNoYes
Local modelsYesaiXcoder markets a sovereign stack trained and served on customer compute, with aiXapply-4B running on a single consumer GPU. No
Cost
Pricing modelseatseat
Starts atn/an/a
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyNoYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/a3,804

Which one would each critic pick

CriticaiXcoderCodyPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.34.8aiXcoder — Pick it if your code cannot leave the building and you are buying in China; pick Tabnine if you want a self-hosted assistant with a Western support contract.
El Crítico4.54.3aiXcoder — Every claim on this row traces to one vendor page: no repository, no changelog, no published pricing, and nothing an outsider can verify before signing.
El Profesor5.85.3aiXcoder — The stated architecture pairs large planning models with a small applier, aiXapply-4B, which is a principled split, and the documentation supporting it is one page.
La Inversora6.55.3aiXcoder — Enterprise sales only with no list price and deployment onto customer infrastructure, which is a services-shaped business wearing a product's name.
La Jefa5.05.8Cody — If Sourcegraph Enterprise is already on the invoice, Cody is a free feature of it; if not, a $16K minimum for an assistant is not a purchase I would make.
El Hacker4.83.3aiXcoder — Closed source and no bring-your-own-key, but the whole stack runs on my own hardware and it does speak MCP, which buys back a little of my goodwill.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.